McGinigle Katharine L, Gourlay Margaret L, Buchanan Ian B
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jun 1;46(11):1717-25. doi: 10.1086/587901.
Active surveillance cultures (ASCs) are universal or targeted microbiological screening cultures for patients admitted to a hospital. ASCs have been proposed to control the increasing numbers of infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms, but their efficacy and cost-effectiveness are unproven. We conducted a systematic review of the literature pertaining to the use of ASCs and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We searched relevant journals and the PubMed Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases. No randomized, controlled trials were identified. Sixteen observational studies and 4 economic analyses were reviewed. Only 2 of the observational studies had a control group. None of the studies were of good quality. Thus, we identified important gaps in the literature, including a need for a clear definition of ASCs, a clear implementation protocol, and rigorous economic evaluations. Existing evidence may favor the use of ASCs, but the evidence is of poor quality, and definitive recommendations cannot be made.
主动监测培养(ASC)是针对住院患者进行的全面或有针对性的微生物筛查培养。有人提议采用ASC来控制因多重耐药菌导致的感染数量不断增加的情况,但其有效性和成本效益尚未得到证实。我们对有关ASC的使用和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)控制的文献进行了系统综述。我们检索了相关期刊以及PubMed Medline、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和考科蓝图书馆数据库。未检索到随机对照试验。我们对16项观察性研究和4项经济学分析进行了综述。只有2项观察性研究设有对照组。没有一项研究质量良好。因此,我们发现了文献中的重要空白,包括需要对ASC进行明确定义、明确的实施方案以及严格的经济学评估。现有证据可能支持使用ASC,但证据质量较差,无法给出明确建议。