Benoliel R, Birman N, Eliav E, Sharav Y
Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Hebrew University-Hadassah, POB 12272, Jerusalem, Israel.
Cephalalgia. 2008 Jul;28(7):752-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01586.x. Epub 2008 May 21.
The aim was to apply diagnostic criteria, as published by the International Headache Society (IHS), to the diagnosis of orofacial pain. A total of 328 consecutive patients with orofacial pain were collected over a period of 2 years. The orofacial pain clinic routinely employs criteria published by the IHS, the American Academy of Orofacial Pain (AAOP) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDCTMD). Employing IHS criteria, 184 patients were successfully diagnosed (56%), including 34 with persistent idiopathic facial pain. In the remaining 144 we applied AAOP/RDCTMD criteria and diagnosed 120 as masticatory myofascial pain (MMP) resulting in a diagnostic efficiency of 92.7% (304/328) when applying the three classifications (IHS, AAOP, RDCTMD). Employing further published criteria, 23 patients were diagnosed as neurovascular orofacial pain (NVOP, facial migraine) and one as a neuropathy secondary to connective tissue disease. All the patients were therefore allocated to predefined diagnoses. MMP is clearly defined by AAOP and the RDCTMD. However, NVOP is not defined by any of the above classification systems. The features of MMP and NVOP are presented and analysed with calculations for positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV). In MMP the combination of facial pain aggravated by jaw movement, and the presence of three or more tender muscles resulted in a PPV = 0.82 and a NPV = 0.86. For NVOP the combination of facial pain, throbbing quality, autonomic and/or systemic features and attack duration of > 60 min gave a PPV = 0.71 and a NPV = 0.95. Expansion of the IHS system is needed so as to integrate more orofacial pain syndromes.
目的是应用国际头痛协会(IHS)发布的诊断标准来诊断口面部疼痛。在2年的时间里,共收集了328例连续性口面部疼痛患者。口面部疼痛诊所常规采用IHS、美国口面部疼痛学会(AAOP)以及颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDCTMD)发布的标准。采用IHS标准,成功诊断出184例患者(56%),其中包括34例持续性特发性面部疼痛患者。在其余144例患者中,我们应用AAOP/RDCTMD标准,诊断出120例为咀嚼肌筋膜疼痛(MMP),当应用三种分类标准(IHS、AAOP、RDCTMD)时,诊断效率为92.7%(304/328)。采用其他已发布的标准,23例患者被诊断为神经血管性口面部疼痛(NVOP,面部偏头痛),1例被诊断为结缔组织病继发的神经病变。因此,所有患者都被分配到预定义的诊断类别中。MMP由AAOP和RDCTMD明确界定。然而,NVOP未被上述任何分类系统所定义。本文呈现并分析了MMP和NVOP的特征,并计算了阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。在MMP中,下颌运动时面部疼痛加剧以及存在三个或更多压痛肌肉的组合,得出PPV = 0.82,NPV = 0.86。对于NVOP,面部疼痛、搏动性性质、自主神经和/或全身特征以及发作持续时间> 60分钟的组合,得出PPV = 0.71,NPV = 0.95。需要扩展IHS系统,以便纳入更多的口面部疼痛综合征。