Dinesh D S, DAS P, Picado A, Davies C, Speybroeck N, Boelaert M, Coosemans M
Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Indian Council of Medical Research, Agamkuan, Patna, India.
Med Vet Entomol. 2008 Jun;22(2):120-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00724.x.
The efficacy of light traps for collecting sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) varies both inter-specifically and intra-specifically (by gender and physiological status) as a result of significant differences in phototropic and other behavioural characteristics. The efficacy of miniature CDC light traps for collecting Phlebotomus argentipes Annandale & Brunetti, a vector of Leishmania donovani Laveran & Mesnil (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), was assessed in the Indian state of Bihar. Sandflies were collected during the night from 16 houses in each of three villages over 3 months (four times at fortnightly intervals) using CDC light traps indoors, and by aspirator collection (carried out by one person for 30 min/house) from the walls of the same houses the following morning. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) between CDC light trap collections and aspirator collections were obtained through a negative binomial regression with household as random effect. CDC light traps were especially effective in catching males (IRR 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-4.46) and unfed females (IRR 3.50, 95% CI 2.37-5.16) of P. argentipes, and to a lesser extent gravids (IRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.07-2.93). However, only a relatively small proportion of all blood-fed P. argentipes were collected by light trap (IRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.73). Despite its limitations in collecting blood-fed female sandflies, the CDC light trap appears to trap a sufficient proportion of the indoor population of sandflies for sampling purposes, and as this light trap is also more convenient and more easily standardized than the aspirator method, we conclude that it is the most efficient method for monitoring P. argentipes populations in the Indian subcontinent.
由于趋光性和其他行为特征存在显著差异,光诱捕器收集白蛉(双翅目:蛾蠓科)的效果在种间和种内(因性别和生理状态)都有所不同。在印度比哈尔邦评估了微型疾病控制中心(CDC)光诱捕器收集杜氏利什曼原虫(动质体目:锥虫科)的传播媒介——安氏白蛉的效果。在3个月内,使用CDC光诱捕器在室内从三个村庄的16所房屋中夜间收集白蛉(每两周进行4次),并于次日早晨通过吸气采集法(由一人在每所房屋采集30分钟)从同一房屋的墙壁上收集白蛉。通过以家庭为随机效应的负二项回归获得CDC光诱捕器收集量与吸气采集量之间的发病率比(IRR)。CDC光诱捕器在捕获安氏白蛉的雄性(IRR 3.08,95%置信区间[CI] 2.12 - 4.46)和未吸血雌性(IRR 3.50,95% CI 2.37 - 5.16)方面特别有效,在捕获孕卵雌蛉方面效果稍差(IRR .77,95% CI 1.07 - 2.93)。然而,通过光诱捕器收集到的所有吸血安氏白蛉的比例相对较小(IRR 0.45,95% CI 0.28 - 0.73)。尽管CDC光诱捕器在收集吸血雌蛉方面存在局限性,但它似乎能捕获足够比例的室内白蛉种群用于抽样,而且由于这种光诱捕器比吸气采集法更方便且更容易标准化,我们得出结论,它是监测印度次大陆安氏白蛉种群最有效的方法。