Suppr超能文献

血管内治疗后动脉瘤残余的特征:对比增强磁共振血管造影与导管数字减影血管造影的比较

Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography.

作者信息

Agid R, Willinsky R A, Lee S-K, Terbrugge K G, Farb R I

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep;29(8):1570-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1124. Epub 2008 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A substantial percentage of coiled aneurysms are associated with persistent filling of an aneurysmal component due to incomplete initial treatment or re-growth. Traditionally follow-up of coiled aneurysms has consisted of repeated intra-arterial cerebral catheter angiography, an invasive procedure with associated risks. Hence, many authors have advocated the use of non-invasive imaging techniques for this purpose. Our aim was to compare contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for depiction of aneurysmal remnants of coiled cerebral aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aneurysms coiled between September 2003 and October 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. We included patients meeting the following criteria: 1) residual/recurrent aneurysm measuring 2 mm or greater, and 2) CE-MRA and DSA performed no more than 60 days apart. Three readers were asked to determine which technique was superior for characterization of the aneurysmal remnant: CE-MRA, DSA, or indeterminate. Statistical analysis included most rule and kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Of 232 patients who underwent coiling, 44 met the inclusion criteria (33 women and 11 men; 24-72 years of age). Sixteen patients had neck remnants and 28 had body remnants. The first study to identify the remnant was DSA in 35 patients and CE-MRA in 9. In 32 patients (32/44, 73%), the readers indicated that CE-MRA was superior to DSA for remnant characterization. CE-MRA and DSA were thought to be equivalent in 7 (16%), and DSA was preferred in 3 (7%). Two cases (5%) yielded ambiguous results. Of the 28 body remnants, 22 (78.6%) were characterized by remnant protrusion into the coil mass: In 20 of these (91%), the readers preferred CE-MRA over DSA, and in 2 cases (9%), the techniques were thought to be equivalent.

CONCLUSION

In patients with known aneurysm remnants, CE-MRA is at least equivalent to DSA for characterization of aneurysmal remnants after coiling. Contrast filling within the coil mass was more clearly seen with CE-MRA than with DSA.

摘要

背景与目的

相当一部分盘绕型动脉瘤由于初始治疗不彻底或再生长,其瘤体部分会持续显影。传统上,盘绕型动脉瘤的随访采用重复动脉内脑导管血管造影术,这是一种具有相关风险的侵入性检查。因此,许多作者主张为此使用非侵入性成像技术。我们的目的是比较对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)与数字减影血管造影(DSA)在显示盘绕型脑动脉瘤的瘤体残余方面的效果。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2003年9月至2006年10月期间进行盘绕治疗的动脉瘤病例。纳入符合以下标准的患者:1)残余/复发性动脉瘤直径≥2mm;2)CE-MRA和DSA检查间隔不超过60天。三位阅片者被要求确定哪种技术在瘤体残余特征显示方面更具优势:CE-MRA、DSA或无法确定。统计分析包括多数规则和kappa统计。

结果

在232例行盘绕治疗的患者中,44例符合纳入标准(33例女性,11例男性;年龄24 - 72岁)。16例患者有瘤颈残余,28例有瘤体残余。首次发现残余的检查中,DSA发现35例,CE-MRA发现9例。在32例患者(32/44,73%)中,阅片者认为CE-MRA在瘤体残余特征显示方面优于DSA。7例(16%)认为CE-MRA和DSA相当,3例(7%)更倾向于DSA。2例(5%)结果不明确。在28例瘤体残余中,22例(78.6%)表现为瘤体向盘绕圈内突出:其中20例(91%)阅片者更倾向于CE-MRA,2例(9%)认为两种技术相当。

结论

在已知有动脉瘤残余的患者中,CE-MRA在显示盘绕型动脉瘤术后瘤体残余特征方面至少与DSA相当。与DSA相比,CE-MRA能更清晰地显示盘绕圈内的造影剂充盈情况。

相似文献

4
Can we now dispense with DSA in the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion even in the most crucial first follow-up after endovascular treatment?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;149:136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
5
CE-MRA for follow-up of aneurysms post stent-assisted coiling.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2012 Sep;18(3):275-83. doi: 10.1177/159101991201800305. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):1033-7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000209236.06451.3b. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
9
Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MR Angiographic Assessment of Endovascular Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms at 1.5 T.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2014 Dec;20(6):686-92. doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10064. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Intracranial aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coil embolization: evaluation with four-dimensional ultrashort-TE MR angiography.
Eur Radiol. 2023 Nov;33(11):7923-7933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09755-1. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
Effectiveness of MRA on embolized intracranial aneurysms: a comparison of DSA, CE-MRA, and TOF-MRA.
J Interv Med. 2019 Apr 30;1(1):32-41. doi: 10.19779/j.cnki.2096-3602.2018.01.08. eCollection 2018 Feb.
6
New technique: the use of the THRIVE sequence in the follow-up of patients who received endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment.
Neuroradiology. 2021 Mar;63(3):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02527-4. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
Usefulness of Vessel Wall MR Imaging for Follow-Up after Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2088-2094. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5824. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Follow-up assessment of coiled intracranial aneurysms using zTE MRA as compared with TOF MRA: a preliminary image quality study.
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4271-4280. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4794-z. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms: work in progress.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2007 Feb;34(1):1-2. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100005709.
3
Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):647-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2423061640. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
5
Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):1033-7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000209236.06451.3b. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
6
Gadolinium--a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Apr;21(4):1104-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfk062. Epub 2006 Jan 23.
10
Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques.
Neuroradiology. 2005 Jul;47(7):507-15. doi: 10.1007/s00234-005-1375-7. Epub 2005 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验