• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术:不良预后危险因素的识别

Carotid artery stenting: identification of risk factors for poor outcomes.

作者信息

Jackson Benjamin M, English Sean J, Fairman Ronald M, Karmacharya Jagajan, Carpenter Jeffrey P, Woo Edward Y

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.005
PMID:18502085
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Age greater than 80 has been identified as a risk factor for complications, including stroke and death, in patients undergoing carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). This study evaluates other potential predictors of perioperative complications in patients undergoing CAS.

METHODS

All cerebrovascular endovascular procedures performed by the vascular surgery division at our university hospital between July 2003 and December 2005 were retrospectively examined. During the course of 212 admissions, 198 patients underwent 215 procedures. Patient age, comorbidities, and admission status were analyzed as independent (predictor) variables. Complication rate, discharge disposition, and length of hospital stay were considered dependent (outcome) variables. Logistic regression and Fisher exact test or Student t test were performed, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Complications included major and minor stroke, myocardial infarction, femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, and death. The rates of perioperative major and minor stroke were 0.5% and 2.8%, respectively. Chronic renal insufficiency was a predictor of perioperative complications, including stroke: patients with serum creatinine greater than 1.3 mg/dL had a 37% complication rate and a 11.1% stroke rate, while those with normal renal function had a 13% complication rate (P = .003) and a 0.6% stroke rate (P =.001). Similar association was seen between creatinine clearance and both stroke and complications. Obesity was a risk factor for complications, but not stroke: obese patients had a complication rate of 28%, while others had a 16% complication rate (P = .024). Emergency admission predicted both extended hospital stay (P < .001) and requirement for further inpatient care in a rehabilitation or nursing facility (P = .007). There was no significant difference in complication rate or stroke rate between octogenarians and others.

CONCLUSION

This experience demonstrates that chronic renal insufficiency, obesity, and emergent clinical setting are risk factors for patients undergoing CAS.

摘要

目的

年龄大于80岁已被确定为接受颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)的患者发生并发症(包括中风和死亡)的危险因素。本研究评估了接受CAS治疗的患者围手术期并发症的其他潜在预测因素。

方法

对我校医院血管外科在2003年7月至2005年12月期间进行的所有脑血管腔内手术进行回顾性检查。在212例入院病例中,198例患者接受了215次手术。将患者年龄、合并症和入院状态作为独立(预测)变量进行分析。并发症发生率、出院处置情况和住院时间被视为相关(结果)变量。酌情进行逻辑回归分析以及Fisher精确检验或Student t检验。

结果

并发症包括严重和轻微中风、心肌梗死、股动脉假性动脉瘤和死亡。围手术期严重和轻微中风的发生率分别为0.5%和2.8%。慢性肾功能不全是围手术期并发症(包括中风)的一个预测因素:血清肌酐大于1.3mg/dL的患者并发症发生率为37%,中风发生率为11.1%,而肾功能正常的患者并发症发生率为13%(P = 0.003),中风发生率为0.6%(P = 0.001)。肌酐清除率与中风和并发症之间也存在类似关联。肥胖是并发症的危险因素,但不是中风的危险因素:肥胖患者的并发症发生率为28%,而其他患者为16%(P = 0.024)。急诊入院预示着住院时间延长(P < 0.001)以及需要在康复或护理机构接受进一步的住院治疗(P = 0.007)。八旬老人与其他患者之间的并发症发生率或中风发生率没有显著差异。

结论

该经验表明,慢性肾功能不全、肥胖和紧急临床情况是接受CAS治疗患者的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting: identification of risk factors for poor outcomes.颈动脉支架置入术:不良预后危险因素的识别
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.005. Epub 2008 May 23.
2
Metabolic syndrome: A predictor of adverse outcomes after carotid revascularization.代谢综合征:颈动脉血运重建术后不良结局的一个预测指标。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 May;49(5):1172-80.e1; discussion 1180. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.011.
3
Diabetes is not a predictor of outcome for carotid revascularization with stenting as it may be for carotid endarterectomy.糖尿病并不是颈动脉支架置入术(carotid revascularization with stenting)预后的预测因素,而颈动脉内膜切除术(carotid endarterectomy)可能是。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;55(1):79-89; discussion 88-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.080. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
4
Intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in the United States in 2005.2005年美国颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后颅内出血情况
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):623-8; discussion 628-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.064.
5
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
6
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting versus historical surgical controls for radiation-induced carotid stenosis.放射性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉支架置入术与历史手术对照的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar;53(3):629-36.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.056. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
8
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
9
Carotid endarterectomy in SAPPHIRE-eligible high-risk patients: implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting.蓝宝石(SAPPHIRE)研究入选标准中的高危患者行颈动脉内膜切除术:对选择颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术患者的启示
J Vasc Surg. 2004 May;39(5):958-65; discussion 965-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.037.
10
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients.颈动脉狭窄高危患者颈动脉支架置入术的结果:单神经血管中心 101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3):448-53; discussion 453-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment results of carotid artery stenting in a developing country.颈动脉支架置入术在发展中国家的治疗结果。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Apr 14;69(4):e20220525. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220525. eCollection 2023.
2
Predictors of Perioperative Stroke/Death after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Review Article.颈动脉支架置入术后围手术期卒中/死亡的预测因素:一篇综述文章。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2018 Mar 25;11(1):15-24. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.17-00136.
3
Carotid Artery Stenting - Strategies to Improve Procedural Performance and Reduce the Learning Curve.
颈动脉支架置入术——提高手术操作水平及缩短学习曲线的策略
Interv Cardiol. 2013 Mar;8(1):50-56. doi: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.1.50.
4
Factors Associated with Increased Rates of Post-procedural Stroke or Death following Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Systematic Review.颈动脉支架置入术后卒中或死亡发生率增加的相关因素:一项系统评价
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014 May;7(1):11-20.
5
Impact of chronic renal insufficiency on the early and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting using serum creatinine vs glomerular filtration rate.应用血清肌酐与肾小球滤过率评估慢性肾功能不全对颈动脉支架置入术近期和远期临床结局的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):797-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.038. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
6
Predictors of minor versus major stroke during carotid artery stenting: results from the carotid artery stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).颈动脉支架置入术中小卒中与大卒中之预测因素:来自 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte(ALKK)颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)登记处的结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2014 May;103(5):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0657-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
7
The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.血管内专业知识在颈动脉支架置入术中的作用:来自 5535 例患者的 ALKK-CAS-Registry 研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Nov;101(11):929-37. doi: 10.1007/s00392-012-0479-4. Epub 2012 May 30.
8
Is age of 80 years a threshold for carotid revascularization?80岁是颈动脉血运重建的一个阈值吗?
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2011 Feb;7(1):15-21. doi: 10.2174/157340311795677716.