Suppr超能文献

基于直线加速器的放射外科治疗与伽玛刀手术治疗动静脉畸形的比较。

Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery compared with Gamma Knife surgery.

作者信息

Orio Peter, Stelzer Keith J, Goodkin Robert, Douglas James G

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, The University of Washington Gamma Knife Facility at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:58-63. doi: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.58.

Abstract

OBJECT

The authors sought to compare the outcomes of patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated by Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) with those of patients treated by linear accelerator-based (LINAC) radiosurgery.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-seven patients with AVMs were treated at our institution between 1992 and 2003. Ninety-one patients were treated with GKS and 96 patients were treated with LINAC radiosurgery. Patient and treatment characteristics in the two groups included the following. In the LINAC group, the median age was 33 years (range 9-66 years); the median dose was 16 Gy (70% isodose line); the median treated AVM volume was 5.5 cm3; and 46% of patients in this group were treated after hemorrhage. In the GKS group, the median age was 38 years (range 6-63 years); the median dose was 20 Gy (50% isodose line); the median treated AVM volume was 4.3 cm3; and 44% of patients in this group were treated after hemorrhage. Obliteration of AVMs was determined by performing computed tomography (CT) angiography and/or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and angiography. Patient follow-up evaluation included obtaining an MR angiogram/MR image or CT angiogram at 6 months, at 1 year, and then annually thereafter. Angiography was performed to confirm obliteration when MR angiography and/or CT angiography no longer revealed evidence of an AVM. The 5-year estimated AVM obliteration rate was 66% in the entire patient group; the LINAC group was 60%; the GKS group was 72%; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.97). Twelve patients who underwent treatment with LINAC radiosurgery underwent retreatment with GKS and one was retreated with LINAC radiosurgery. The obliteration rate was 82%. Six patients treated with GKS were retreated with GKS, but the follow-up time is of short duration. Chronic toxicity occurred in 8% of both the GKS and the LINAC groups (p = 0.61). Posttreatment hemorrhage during the time of risk before AVM obliteration was 13% in the GKS group and 6.2% in the LINAC group (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with AVMs by using LINAC radiosurgery and GKS treatment produces high obliteration rates with acceptable long-term radiation toxicity in the patients treated.

摘要

目的

作者旨在比较接受伽玛刀手术(GKS)治疗的动静脉畸形(AVM)患者与接受基于直线加速器(LINAC)的放射外科治疗的患者的治疗结果。

方法

1992年至2003年间,我院共治疗了187例AVM患者。91例患者接受了GKS治疗,96例患者接受了LINAC放射外科治疗。两组患者及治疗特征如下。LINAC组中,年龄中位数为33岁(范围9 - 66岁);中位剂量为16 Gy(70%等剂量线);治疗的AVM中位体积为5.5 cm³;该组46%的患者在出血后接受治疗。GKS组中,年龄中位数为38岁(范围6 - 63岁);中位剂量为20 Gy(50%等剂量线);治疗的AVM中位体积为4.3 cm³;该组44%的患者在出血后接受治疗。通过计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影和/或磁共振(MR)血管造影及血管造影确定AVM的闭塞情况。患者随访评估包括在6个月、1年时以及此后每年获取MR血管造影/MR图像或CT血管造影。当MR血管造影和/或CT血管造影不再显示AVM证据时,进行血管造影以确认闭塞。整个患者组的5年估计AVM闭塞率为66%;LINAC组为60%;GKS组为72%;差异无统计学意义(p = 0.97)。12例接受LINAC放射外科治疗的患者接受了GKS再治疗,1例接受了LINAC放射外科再治疗。闭塞率为82%。6例接受GKS治疗的患者接受了GKS再治疗,但随访时间较短。GKS组和LINAC组的慢性毒性发生率均为8%(p = 0.61)。在AVM闭塞前的风险期内,GKS组治疗后出血率为13%,LINAC组为6.2%(p = 0.05)。

结论

使用LINAC放射外科和GKS治疗AVM患者可产生较高的闭塞率,且治疗患者的长期放射毒性可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验