Immunologic targets in the etiology of allograft vasculopathy: endothelium versus media.

The respective roles of the endothelium and the media as allo-immune targets in the generation of allograft vasculopathy (AV) have yet to be clearly defined. Although endothelial damage has been implicated in the progression of AV, evidence from mechanical vascular injury models suggests that medial injury may play a more dominant role. The overall objective of this research was to determine the relative importance of the endothelium versus the media as a target for immune injury and induction of AV. To investigate this we developed a novel model which involved the creation of chimeric aortic segments. To accomplish this we removed aortic segments from C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice and stripped them of endothelium by a short pulse with EDTA. The stripped C3H grafts were implanted into immunodeficient C57BL/6 (B6) RAG1(-/-) mice for a period of 21 days. As the immunodeficient mice did not mount an allo-immune response to the grafts, the endothelium was renewed by normal repair mechanisms. The new endothelium was recipient in origin, resulting in a chimeric graft with C3H media and B6 endothelium. We confirmed complete denudement by immunocytochemistry for endothelial specific markers, as well as by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Replacement of endothelium with recipient endothelial cells was confirmed by immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy and by using a green fluorescent protein mouse transplant combination. Subsequent re-transplantation of the chimeric grafts into either B6 or C3H recipients demonstrated that an allogeneic media is more important than an allogeneic endothelium in inducing robust AV.