Saad Nael E A, Saad Wael E A, Davies Mark G, Waldman David L
Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):890-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
To determine the technical and clinical outcomes of recannulating the tracts of inadvertently discontinued high-flow tunneled internal jugular central venous catheters.
Retrospective review was performed of 49 patients who underwent 57 replacements of inadvertently discontinued catheters by recannulation from January 1997 through January 2005. The study group was divided into successful and failed recannulation groups. Technical results were evaluated for duration the catheter had been out, tract age, and laterality (ie, right vs left). Infection rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and the infection rate per 100 catheter days was calculated. Intent-to-treat function rate (including failed recannulations) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Seventy percent (n = 40) of discontinued catheters were right-sided and 30% (n = 17) were left-sided. The overall technical success rate was 86% (n = 49). The technical success rates were 100% (n = 10), 89% (32 of 36), and 64% (seven of 11) for catheters that had been outside the body for less than 12 hours, 12-24 hours, and more than 24 hours, respectively. P values for successful versus failed recannulations for tract age, the time the catheter was out, and laterality were .02, .04, and .68, respectively. The infection rate for successful recannulations at 6 months was 24% +/- 9% (0.22 infections per 100 catheter days). Functional catheter rates at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months were 55% +/- 8%, 46% +/- 8%, 29% +/- 10%, and 5% +/- 3%, respectively.
Recannulating tunneled high-flow jugular catheter tracts has a high technical success rate, particularly when they have fallen out less than 24 hours earlier and have a mature tract. The outcomes of recannulated catheters (ie, infection and function rates) are within the upper limit of results of de novo placement and over-the-wire exchange of catheters in the literature.
确定对意外中断使用的高流量隧道式颈内中心静脉导管重新建立通道的技术和临床效果。
回顾性分析了1997年1月至2005年1月期间49例患者,这些患者通过重新建立通道对57根意外中断使用的导管进行了更换。研究组分为重新建立通道成功组和失败组。评估技术结果时考虑导管留置体外的时间、通道成熟度和导管位置(即右侧与左侧)。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算感染率,并计算每100导管日的感染率。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算意向性治疗功能率(包括重新建立通道失败的情况)。
中断使用的导管中,70%(n = 40)为右侧,30%(n = 17)为左侧。总体技术成功率为86%(n = 49)。导管留置体外时间少于12小时、12 - 24小时和超过24小时的重新建立通道技术成功率分别为100%(n = 10)、89%(36例中的32例)和64%(11例中的7例)。重新建立通道成功与失败在通道成熟度、导管留置体外时间和导管位置方面的P值分别为0.02、0.04和0.68。重新建立通道成功的患者6个月时的感染率为24%±9%(每100导管日0.22次感染)。3、6、9和12个月时导管的功能率分别为55%±8%、46%±8%、29%±10%和5%±3%。
重新建立隧道式高流量颈静脉导管通道具有较高的技术成功率,尤其是在导管拔出时间少于24小时且通道已成熟的情况下。重新建立通道后的导管的效果(即感染率和功能率)在文献中导管初次置入和导丝交换结果的上限范围内。