• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常眼压性青光眼患者的中央角膜厚度

Central corneal thickness in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.

作者信息

Konareva-Kostianeva Marieta I, Atanassov Marin A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2007;49(3-4):36-41.

PMID:18504932
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the central corneal thickness of eyes with proved normal-tension glaucoma with that of eyes without glaucoma.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

METHODS

The study included 30 consecutive patients with normal-tension glaucoma (60 eyes, group I), and 30 age- and gender-matched non-glaucoma patients (60 eyes, group II). Central corneal thickness was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter (Pach IV, Accutome). The mean central corneal thickness of normal-tension glaucoma patients and controls were compared using independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SD) central corneal thickness of normal-tension glaucoma and non-glaucoma patients was 517.4 +/- 19.2 microm and 549.0 +/- 39.4 microm, respectively. There was a significant difference in this parameter between the groups (P < 0.001). The mean intraocular pressure was higher in glaucomatous eyes (17.1 +/- 2.3 vs. 16.3 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, P = 0.028). The visual acuity in normal-tension glaucoma eyes was lower than that in controls, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that corneas of patients with normal-tension glaucoma are thinner than those of non-glaucoma patients.

摘要

目的

比较确诊为正常眼压性青光眼的眼睛与无青光眼的眼睛的中央角膜厚度。

设计

一项前瞻性研究。

方法

该研究纳入了30例连续的正常眼压性青光眼患者(60只眼,I组),以及30例年龄和性别匹配的非青光眼患者(60只眼,II组)。使用超声角膜测厚仪(Pach IV,Accutome)测量中央角膜厚度。采用独立样本t检验比较正常眼压性青光眼患者和对照组的平均中央角膜厚度。

结果

正常眼压性青光眼患者和非青光眼患者的平均(±标准差)中央角膜厚度分别为517.4±19.2微米和549.0±39.4微米。两组之间该参数存在显著差异(P<0.001)。青光眼患者的平均眼压较高(17.1±2.3对16.3±1.4毫米汞柱,P = 0.028)。正常眼压性青光眼患者的视力低于对照组,但差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.069)。

结论

结果表明,正常眼压性青光眼患者的角膜比非青光眼患者的角膜更薄。

相似文献

1
Central corneal thickness in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼患者的中央角膜厚度
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2007;49(3-4):36-41.
2
Central corneal thickness in low-tension glaucoma.低眼压性青光眼的中央角膜厚度
Can J Ophthalmol. 1999 Oct;34(6):319-24.
3
Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in Puerto Rican glaucoma patients.波多黎各青光眼患者的中央角膜厚度和眼压
P R Health Sci J. 2007 Mar;26(1):23-7.
4
Corneal thickness and curvature in normal-tension glaucoma.正常眼压性青光眼的角膜厚度和曲率
Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Feb;125(2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)80086-5.
5
Central corneal thickness of normal-tension glaucoma and non-glaucoma populations in ethnic Chinese.华裔正常眼压性青光眼和非青光眼人群的中央角膜厚度
Chang Gung Med J. 2004 Jan;27(1):50-5.
6
[Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].[动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计:薄角膜中有无青光眼损害的眼睛之间眼压值的差异]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015 Oct;232(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-104772. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
[Central corneal thickness measurement in normal tension glaucoma].[正常眼压性青光眼中的中央角膜厚度测量]
Klin Oczna. 2004;106(1-2 Suppl):236-7.
8
[Importance of central corneal thickness when studying ocular hypertensive eyes, glaucoma suspects and preperimetric glaucomatous eyes].[研究高眼压眼、青光眼可疑者及视野检查前青光眼性眼病时中央角膜厚度的重要性]
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007 Oct;82(10):615-21. doi: 10.4321/s0365-66912007001000005.
9
Corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma.先天性青光眼的角膜厚度
J Glaucoma. 2004 Jun;13(3):185-8. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200406000-00002.
10
Central corneal thickness measurements in ocular hypertension, primary open angle glaucoma, glaucoma suspects and control subjects.
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2008;50(1):35-9.