Metro Giulio, Fabi Alessandra, Russillo Michelangelo, Papaldo Paola, De Laurentiis Michelino, Ferretti Gianluigi, Pellegrini Domenica, Nuzzo Carmen, Graziano Vanessa, Vici Patrizia, Introna Marianna, Felici Alessandra, Cognetti Francesco, Carlini Paolo
Division of Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Anticancer Res. 2008 Mar-Apr;28(2B):1245-58.
The management of human epidermal receptor-2 (HER-2) negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is usually problematic, since no standard therapy exists in this setting. For some patients, combination chemotherapy represents a valuable approach, although its use is often limited by the risks of increased toxicity as well as impairments in quality of life (QoL) that often outweigh the marginal efficacy benefit. Against this background, the use of taxanes, either paclitaxel or docetaxel, in combination with gemcitabine as first-line treatment of HER-2 negative MBC is supported by the evidence of the single-agent activity of these drugs, beneficial pharmacological interactions, different mechanisms of action and largely non superimposable toxicity profiles. A number of phase II studies have explored the activity of a taxane plus gemcitabine in both chemonaïve and pretreated MBC patients, all showing remarkably high response rates and exceptional tolerability. In randomized phase III trials, the paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination showed significant improvements in objective responses, time to progression and overall survival, as compared to paclitaxel monotherapy, whereas the docetaxel and gemcitabine doublet demonstrated equal efficacy and better tolerability, as compared to docetaxel plus capecitabine. In addition to standard threeweekly dosing regimens, alternative schedules of administration of taxanes and gemcitabine doublets (weekly, twoweekly) might deserve further investigation due to their potential usefulness in reducing pharmacological toxicity while maintaining or increasing dose-intensity and clinical efficacy. Furthermore, uncertainty exists on which taxane should be preferred in combination with gemcitabine, since no head-to-head comparison between paclitaxel-gemcitabine and docetaxel-gemcitabine has been performed so far. Ongoing trials will address these issues and future investigations will also include the evaluation of bevacizumab, the monoclonal antibody targeted against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in combination with taxanes and gemcitabine doublets.
人表皮生长因子受体2(HER-2)阴性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的治疗通常存在问题,因为在这种情况下尚无标准疗法。对于一些患者而言,联合化疗是一种有价值的方法,尽管其应用常常因毒性增加的风险以及生活质量(QoL)受损而受到限制,而这些风险往往超过了边际疗效益处。在此背景下,紫杉烷类药物(紫杉醇或多西他赛)联合吉西他滨作为HER-2阴性MBC的一线治疗方法,得到了这些药物单药活性、有益的药理相互作用、不同作用机制以及毒性特征基本不重叠等证据的支持。多项II期研究探讨了紫杉烷类药物联合吉西他滨在初治和经治MBC患者中的活性,所有研究均显示出极高的缓解率和出色的耐受性。在随机III期试验中,与紫杉醇单药治疗相比,紫杉醇与吉西他滨联合治疗在客观缓解率、疾病进展时间和总生存期方面均有显著改善;而与多西他赛加卡培他滨相比,多西他赛与吉西他滨联合治疗显示出同等疗效和更好的耐受性。除了标准的每三周给药方案外,紫杉烷类药物与吉西他滨联合治疗的替代给药方案(每周、每两周)因其在降低药物毒性同时维持或增加剂量强度及临床疗效方面的潜在作用,可能值得进一步研究。此外,对于联合吉西他滨时应首选哪种紫杉烷类药物仍存在不确定性,因为迄今为止尚未对紫杉醇-吉西他滨和多西他赛-吉西他滨进行直接比较。正在进行的试验将解决这些问题,未来的研究还将包括评估抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)单克隆抗体贝伐单抗与紫杉烷类药物和吉西他滨联合治疗的效果。