Schäfer D, Dienes H P, Fett A L, Langhammer K
Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Geb. 42, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 20, 50931, Köln.
Pathologe. 2008 Jul;29(4):287-93. doi: 10.1007/s00292-008-1008-0.
The first half of the twentieth century was marked by noticeable changes in society, medicine and institutions. The interrelationship between these factors can be demonstrated by clinical mass sources, in particular by patient and autopsy records, which historians have so far neglected. A longitudinal study was made where data, such as gender and age as well as clinical and anatomical-pathological diagnoses were collected, based on 250 autopsy records from 8 selected years between 1914 and 1960. The random samples taken showed clear differences in gender relationship and in age composition and in addition they revealed a significant reduction in mortality caused by inflammation and an increase of chronic diseases, such as tumors or cardiac-circulation ailments. The origin of this development is seen in medical progress as well as in institutional and ideological circumstances, therefore multidimensional reciprocal effects must be thoroughly analyzed.
二十世纪上半叶的特点是社会、医学和机构发生了显著变化。这些因素之间的相互关系可以通过临床大量资料来证明,特别是通过患者和尸检记录,而历史学家迄今一直忽视了这些记录。我们进行了一项纵向研究,基于1914年至1960年间8个选定年份的250份尸检记录,收集了诸如性别、年龄以及临床和解剖病理诊断等数据。所抽取的随机样本在性别关系和年龄构成上显示出明显差异,此外还显示出炎症导致的死亡率显著降低,以及肿瘤或心脏循环疾病等慢性病的增加。这种发展的根源既在于医学进步,也在于机构和意识形态环境,因此必须对多维度的相互影响进行深入分析。