Outcome of induced deliveries in growth-restricted fetuses: second thoughts about the vaginal option.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of induced deliveries with IUGR.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed the computerized files of parturients who underwent inducted labor because of IUGR (<5th percentile). Outcome assessment included mode of delivery, indication for CS, NICU admissions and 5 min Apgar score. We compared these parameters to a control group of women whose deliveries were induced for other indications.

RESULTS

A total of 836 women with IUGR were included. Mean gestational age and birth weight were 38.2 weeks and 2,114 g, respectively. Overall, 43% of women delivered by non-elective C/S. The rate of non-elective CS for other indications was 12.3% (P < 0.0001) for all deliveries and 23.6% (P < 0.001) for induced deliveries. CS was performed due to non-reassuring FHR in 63% of IUGR fetuses, compared with 27% of all induced deliveries. There were 160 women with IUGR who preferred elective CS. Their newborns' NICU admission and 5 min Apgar score <7 rates were lower than those for induced deliveries (NICU 43.1 and 29.4%, P < 0.05, 5 min Apgar <7 5 and 1%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Growth-restricted neonates born after labor induction had higher rates of low Apgar scores and NICU admissions compared to growth restricted neonates delivered by elective C/S. Inductions of labor for IUGR were associated with higher rates of non-elective C/S due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate compared with inductions performed for other indications.