Fletcher Thomas D, Cunningham Jennifer L, Calsyn Robert J, Morse Gary A, Klinkenberg W Dean
Psychology Department, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Jul;35(4):319-36. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0170-2. Epub 2008 May 28.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the three approaches for treating dual disorder clients who were homeless at intake: integrated assertive community treatment (IACT), assertive community treatment only (ACTO), and standard care (SC). Multilevel Random Coefficient Modeling (MRCM) was used to analyze longitudinal effects and to identify mediators of significant treatment effects. The outcome variables were consumer satisfaction, stable housing, psychiatric symptoms, and substance abuse. The eight mediators were service utilization variables: program contacts, phone contacts, substance abuse contacts, assistance with activities of daily living, transportation assistance, help finding permanent housing, help with emotional problems, and medication assistance. The 191 eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions and followed for a period of 30 months. Both ACTO and IACT produced better outcomes than SC on consumer satisfaction and stable housing. There were no differences on any of the outcome variables between ACTO versus IACT when comparing main effects. However, there were several treatment by time interactions. In addition, there were many mediation effects.
综合主动社区治疗(IACT)、仅主动社区治疗(ACTO)和标准护理(SC)。采用多水平随机系数模型(MRCM)分析纵向效应并确定显著治疗效果的中介因素。结果变量包括消费者满意度、稳定住房、精神症状和药物滥用。八个中介因素是服务利用变量:项目接触、电话接触、药物滥用接触、日常生活活动协助、交通协助、寻找永久住房帮助、情绪问题帮助和药物协助。191名符合条件的参与者被随机分配到三种情况之一,并随访30个月。在消费者满意度和稳定住房方面,ACTO和IACT的效果均优于SC。比较主要效应时,ACTO与IACT在任何结果变量上均无差异。然而,存在几个治疗与时间的交互作用。此外,还有许多中介效应。