Bolaños-Carmona Victoria, González-López Santiago, De Haro-Muñoz Cristina, Briones-Luján María T
Department of Integrated Clinical Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008 Nov;87(2):499-507. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31135.
The aim of the study was to determine the interfacial morphology and bond strength of three current self-etching adhesives (SEAs) to primary dentin and to evaluate the effect of introducing an additional step of phosphoric acid etching. Three human primary molars were assigned to each adhesive group for testing microtensile bond strength (microTBS) and three for studying interface morphology. Groups were: group 1, Excite, a total-etch adhesive (control); group 2, Adhese (ASE); group 3, Adper-Prompt-L-Pop (APLP), and group 4: Xeno III (XE) SEAs; groups 5-7 received application of 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s before applying ASE, APLP, and XE, respectively. A class I cavity was performed in each molar to study the interface morphology. Two halves of each tooth were used for examination either by optical microscopy, using Masson's trichromic dye technique, or by scanning electron microscopy. For microTBS determination, composite/dentin bars (1 mm(2) section) were obtained from each tooth, and tested in tension until debonding. The microTBS was significantly lower in the APLP than in the rest of the groups. The performance of SEAs on primary dentin depends on the product. Inclusion of dentin pre-etching step did not significantly modify microTBS results. All SAEs achieved greater decalcification depth on etched versus nonetched dentin.
本研究的目的是确定三种市售自酸蚀粘结剂(SEA)与乳牙本质的界面形态和粘结强度,并评估增加一步磷酸酸蚀步骤的效果。每个粘结剂组分配三颗人类乳牙用于测试微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS),另外三颗用于研究界面形态。分组如下:第1组,Excite,一种全酸蚀粘结剂(对照组);第2组,Adhese(ASE);第3组,Adper-Prompt-L-Pop(APLP);第4组,Xeno III(XE)SEA;第5 - 7组在分别应用ASE、APLP和XE之前,先使用37%的磷酸酸蚀15秒。在每颗磨牙上制备I类洞以研究界面形态。每颗牙齿的两半分别通过光学显微镜(使用马松三色染色技术)或扫描电子显微镜进行检查。对于microTBS测定,从每颗牙齿获取复合树脂/牙本质条(1平方毫米截面),并进行拉伸测试直至脱粘。APLP组的microTBS显著低于其他组。SEA在乳牙本质上的性能取决于产品。加入牙本质预酸蚀步骤并未显著改变microTBS结果。所有SEA在酸蚀牙本质上比未酸蚀牙本质实现了更大的脱钙深度。