• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医护人员与《公平劳动标准法》。

Home healthcare workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act.

作者信息

Fowler Rebecca M

机构信息

Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, L.L.P., Tulsa, USA.

出版信息

J Health Life Sci Law. 2008 Apr;1(3):107, 109-35.

PMID:18507322
Abstract

In a major industry shift, long term care is moving from nursing homes and institutions to the private home. This change results from a number of factors, including the lower cost of home-based care. These lower costs can be traced to a number of exemptions from the Fair Labor Standards Act requirements for minimum wage and premium overtime payments which apply to many home healthcare workers. These include the companionship, live-in, and professional exemptions. As the home healthcare industry has grown, home healthcare workers have challenged the applicability of these exemptions. This article will explore the issues reflected in those challenges and their resolution, and provide suggestions to help employers ensure that their employees fall within the exemptions.

摘要

在一项重大的行业转变中,长期护理正从疗养院和机构转向私人住宅。这一变化是由多种因素导致的,包括居家护理成本较低。这些较低的成本可归因于《公平劳动标准法》中许多家庭医护人员适用的最低工资和加班补贴要求的多项豁免。这些豁免包括陪伴、住家以及专业豁免。随着家庭医护行业的发展,家庭医护人员对这些豁免的适用性提出了质疑。本文将探讨这些质疑中所反映的问题及其解决方案,并提供建议以帮助雇主确保其员工符合豁免条件。

相似文献

1
Home healthcare workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act.家庭医护人员与《公平劳动标准法》。
J Health Life Sci Law. 2008 Apr;1(3):107, 109-35.
2
New labor rule hurting, not helping some home health workers.新的劳工规定正在伤害而非帮助一些家庭健康护理工作者。
Mod Healthc. 2016 Feb 1;46(5):12.
3
Regulating payment for home care companionship services: legal authority and public policy.规范居家护理陪伴服务的支付:法律权威与公共政策。
Care Manag J. 2008;9(3):122-7. doi: 10.1891/1521-0987.9.3.122.
4
Legal ramifications of per visit pay in the USA.美国每次就诊付费的法律后果。
Caring. 2006 Feb;25(2):42-8.
5
'It's long overdue'. Home-care agencies cheer, jeer rule as change nears.“早就该这样了”。随着变革临近,家庭护理机构对此规定欢呼、嘲笑。
Mod Healthc. 2013 Sep 23;43(38):10.
6
The Coke case: in reality it is clients vs. home care aides.可口可乐案:实际上是客户与家庭护理助手之间的矛盾。
Caring. 2007 Feb;26(2):24-6.
7
Weighing obligations to home care workers and Medicaid recipients.权衡家庭护理人员和医疗补助受助人的义务。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):418-424. doi: 10.1177/0969733017718396. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
The trouble with the Coke case: an opposing view.可口可乐案的问题:一种反对观点。
Caring. 2007 Feb;26(2):27-9.
9
Overtime ruling applauded. SEIU taking home-care workers' case to states.加班规定获赞赏。服务业员工国际工会将家庭护理工案件提交至各州。
Mod Healthc. 2007 Jun 18;37(25):10-1.
10
Professionally exempt nurses & the fee basis of payment.专业豁免护士与收费支付基础。
Caring. 2003 Sep;22(9):12-6.