Scalone Luciana, Mantovani Lorenzo G, Krol Marieke, Rofail Diana, Ravera Simona, Bisconte Maria Grazia, Borgna-Pignatti Caterina, Borsellino Zelia, Cianciulli Paolo, Gallisai Domenico, Prossomariti Luciano, Stefàno Ippazio, Cappellini Maria D
CIRFF - Centre of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; CHARTA Foundation (member of COPERA), Milan, Italy.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jul;24(7):1905-17. doi: 10.1185/03007990802160834. Epub 2008 May 27.
Iron chelation treatment (ICT) in beta-thalassemia major (beta-TM) patients undergoing blood transfusions can cause low satisfaction, low compliance, with possible negative consequences on treatment success, patients' wellbeing, and costs. The purpose was to estimate the societal burden attributable to beta-TM in terms of direct and indirect costs, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), satisfaction and compliance with ICT in patients undergoing transfusions and ICT.
The naturalistic, multicenter, longitudinal Italian-THAlassemia-Cost-&-Outcomes-Assessment (ITHACA) cost-of-illness study was conducted involving patients of any age, on ICT for at least 3 years, who were enrolled at 8 Italian Thalassemia Care Centers. Costs were estimated from the societal perspective, quantified with tariffs, prices, or net earnings valid in 2006.
One-hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled (median age = 28.3, 3-48 years, 49.6% male) and retrospectively observed for a median of 11.6 months. Mean direct costs were euro1242/patient/month, 55.5% attributable to ICT, 33.2% attributable to transfusions. Relevant quantity and quality of productivity was lost. Both physical and mental components of HRQoL were compromised. Little difficulties remembering to take ICT and positive satisfaction with the perceived effectiveness of therapy were declared, but not good levels of satisfaction with acceptance, perception of side effects and burden of ICT.
The management of beta-TM patients undergoing transfusions and ICT is efficacious, although costly, but overall benefits were not always perceived as optimal by patients. Efforts must be focused to improve patients' acceptance and satisfaction with their therapy; this would contribute to a better compliance and hence an increase in treatment effectiveness and patients' overall wellbeing, with expected improved allocation of human and economic resources.
对于接受输血治疗的重型β地中海贫血(β-TM)患者,铁螯合疗法(ICT)可能导致满意度低、依从性差,并可能对治疗成功、患者健康和成本产生负面影响。本研究旨在从直接和间接成本、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、接受输血和ICT治疗患者对ICT的满意度及依从性等方面,评估β-TM造成的社会负担。
开展了一项自然主义、多中心、纵向的意大利β地中海贫血成本与结局评估(ITHACA)疾病成本研究,纳入了来自8个意大利地中海贫血护理中心、接受ICT治疗至少3年的各年龄段患者。从社会角度估算成本,采用2006年有效的收费标准、价格或净收益进行量化。
共纳入137例患者(中位年龄=28.3岁,3 - 48岁,49.6%为男性),回顾性观察时间中位数为11.6个月。平均直接成本为每位患者每月1242欧元,其中55.5%归因于ICT,33.2%归因于输血。生产力在数量和质量方面都有损失。HRQoL的身体和心理成分均受到损害。患者表示在记住服用ICT方面几乎没有困难,对治疗效果的感知满意度较高,但对ICT的接受度、副作用感知和负担方面的满意度不高。
对接受输血和ICT治疗的β-TM患者的管理是有效的,尽管成本高昂,但患者并不总是认为总体益处是最佳的。必须致力于提高患者对治疗的接受度和满意度;这将有助于提高依从性,从而提高治疗效果和患者的整体健康状况,并有望改善人力和经济资源的分配。