Hannes Karin, Norré David, Goedhuys Jo, Naert Ignace, Aertgeerts Bert
Belgian Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Belgian Branch of the Cochrane Collaboration, Belgium.
J Dent Educ. 2008 Jun;72(6):736-44.
In many countries, questions have been raised about the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in oral health care. The call for an increase in EBP seems to face many obstacles. Only limited empirical studies address these obstacles. We present a qualitative study that explores the obstacles that Flemish (Belgian, Dutch-speaking) dentists experience in the implementation of EBP in routine clinical work. We collected data from discussions in focus groups. Seventy-nine dentists participated. The data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Three major categories of obstacles were identified. These categories relate to obstacles in 1) evidence, 2) partners in health care (medical doctors, patients, and government), and 3) the field of dentistry. Our findings suggest that educators should provide communication skills to aid decision making, address the technical dimensions of dentistry, promote lifelong learning, and close the gap between academics and general practitioners (dentists) in order to create mutual understanding. The obstacles identified are considered useful to support future quantitative research that can be generalized to a broader group.
在许多国家,人们对循证实践(EBP)在口腔医疗保健中的应用提出了质疑。增加循证实践的呼声似乎面临诸多障碍。仅有有限的实证研究探讨了这些障碍。我们开展了一项定性研究,探究弗拉芒(比利时,说荷兰语地区)牙医在日常临床工作中实施循证实践时所遇到的障碍。我们通过焦点小组讨论收集数据。79名牙医参与其中。数据采用持续比较分析法进行分析。确定了三大类障碍。这些类别涉及1)证据方面、2)医疗保健合作伙伴(医生、患者和政府)方面以及3)牙科领域方面的障碍。我们的研究结果表明,教育工作者应提供沟通技巧以辅助决策,解决牙科的技术层面问题,促进终身学习,并缩小学术界与全科医生(牙医)之间的差距,以达成相互理解。所确定的这些障碍被认为有助于支持未来可推广至更广泛群体的定量研究。