Lordkipanidzé Marie, Pharand Chantal, Nguyen Thuy Anh, Schampaert Erick, Diodati Jean G
Faculties of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Ther Drug Monit. 2008 Jun;30(3):372-8. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181757c59.
The emergence of point-of-care assays enabling bedside testing such as the VerifyNow P2Y12 system might prove useful in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to estimate the inhibition of platelet aggregation provided by clopidogrel in the absence of baseline off-drug aggregation data. Sixty-eight patients with coronary artery disease scheduled to initiate clopidogrel therapy underwent platelet aggregation testing by VerifyNow P2Y12 at baseline and after clopidogrel administration. The inhibition reported by the VerifyNow assay (relative to thrombin receptor activating peptide-induced platelet aggregation, serving as baseline) was compared with that calculated with the actual adenosine diphosphate-induced baseline obtained with the same methodology. The postclopidogrel thrombin receptor activating peptide-induced aggregation showed a great discordance with that induced by adenosine diphosphate before clopidogrel with a bias of 24 units (95% limits of agreement from -142 to 190 units). Moreover, the inhibition reported by the assay overestimated the standard before-and-after testing data by an average of 8% (95% limits of agreement from -49% to 65%), making its use without a true baseline comparator unsatisfactory. The VerifyNow P2Y12 assay fails to accurately quantify platelet inhibition achieved by clopidogrel compared with before-and-after testing. Further studies are required to establish the clinical usefulness of the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to accurately predict the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with reduced clopidogrel efficacy before it can be implemented in clinical practice. At present, the use of this assay in clinical care cannot be recommended for monitoring clopidogrel therapy.
即时检验法的出现,如VerifyNow P2Y12系统这类能实现床旁检测的方法,在临床环境中可能会被证明是有用的。本研究的目的是评估VerifyNow P2Y12检测法在缺乏基线非药物聚集数据的情况下,估算氯吡格雷对血小板聚集抑制作用的能力。68例计划开始氯吡格雷治疗的冠心病患者在基线期和服用氯吡格雷后,通过VerifyNow P2Y12进行血小板聚集检测。将VerifyNow检测法报告的抑制率(相对于凝血酶受体激活肽诱导的血小板聚集,作为基线)与用相同方法获得的实际二磷酸腺苷诱导的基线计算得出的抑制率进行比较。氯吡格雷治疗后凝血酶受体激活肽诱导的聚集与氯吡格雷治疗前二磷酸腺苷诱导的聚集存在很大差异,偏差为24个单位(95%一致性界限为-142至190个单位)。此外,该检测法报告的抑制率比标准的检测前后数据平均高估了8%(95%一致性界限为-49%至65%),这使得在没有真正基线对照的情况下使用该检测法并不理想。与检测前后的情况相比,VerifyNow P2Y12检测法无法准确量化氯吡格雷实现的血小板抑制作用。在VerifyNow P2Y12检测法能够在临床实践中应用之前,需要进一步研究以确定其在准确预测氯吡格雷疗效降低的患者发生主要不良心血管事件方面的临床实用性。目前,不推荐在临床护理中使用该检测法来监测氯吡格雷治疗。