Langer Corey J, O'Byrne Kenneth J, Socinski Mark A, Mikhailov Sergei M, Leśniewski-Kmak Krzysztof, Smakal Martin, Ciuleanu Tudor E, Orlov Sergey V, Dediu Mircea, Heigener David, Eisenfeld Amy J, Sandalic Larissa, Oldham Fred B, Singer Jack W, Ross Helen J
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA.
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jun;3(6):623-30. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181753b4b.
Performance status (PS) 2 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience more toxicity, lower response rates, and shorter survival times than healthier patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a macromolecule drug conjugate of paclitaxel and polyglutamic acid, reduces systemic exposure to peak concentrations of free paclitaxel and may lead to increased concentrations in tumors due to enhanced vascular permeability.
Chemotherapy-naive PS 2 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and either PPX (210 mg/m/10 min without routine steroid premedication) or paclitaxel (225 mg/m/3 h with standard premedication) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.
A total of 400 patients were enrolled. Alopecia, arthralgias/myalgias, and cardiac events were significantly less frequent with PPX/carboplatin, whereas grade > or =3 neutropenia and grade 3 neuropathy showed a trend of worsening. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions despite the absence of routine premedication in the PPX arm. Overall survival was similar between treatment arms (hazard ratio, 0.97; log rank p = 0.769). Median and 1-year survival rates were 7.9 months and 31%, for PPX versus 8 months and 31% for paclitaxel. Disease control rates were 64% and 69% for PPX and paclitaxel, respectively. Time to progression was similar: 3.9 months for PPX/carboplatin versus 4.6 months for paclitaxel/carboplatin (p = 0.210).
PPX/carboplatin failed to provide superior survival compared with paclitaxel/carboplatin in the first-line treatment of PS 2 patients with NSCLC, but the results with respect to progression-free survival and overall survival were comparable and the PPX regimen was more convenient.
与接受标准化疗的健康患者相比,体能状态(PS)为2的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者毒性反应更多、缓解率更低且生存时间更短。紫杉醇聚谷氨酸酯(PPX)是一种紫杉醇与聚谷氨酸的大分子药物偶联物,可降低全身游离紫杉醇峰值浓度的暴露,并可能因血管通透性增强而导致肿瘤内浓度升高。
既往未接受过化疗、PS为2的晚期NSCLC患者被随机分组,每3周接受卡铂(曲线下面积=6)联合PPX(210mg/m²静脉滴注10分钟,不进行常规类固醇预处理)或紫杉醇(225mg/m²静脉滴注3小时,进行标准预处理)治疗。主要终点为总生存期。
共纳入400例患者。PPX/卡铂组的脱发、关节痛/肌痛和心脏事件发生率显著更低,而≥3级中性粒细胞减少和3级神经病变有加重趋势。尽管PPX组未进行常规预处理,但过敏反应发生率无显著差异。各治疗组的总生存期相似(风险比,0.97;对数秩检验p=0.769)。PPX组的中位生存期和1年生存率分别为7.9个月和31%,紫杉醇组为8个月和31%。疾病控制率PPX组和紫杉醇组分别为64%和69%。进展时间相似:PPX/卡铂组为3.9个月,紫杉醇/卡铂组为4.6个月(p=0.210)。
在PS为2的NSCLC患者一线治疗中,PPX/卡铂与紫杉醇/卡铂相比未能提供更优的生存期,但无进展生存期和总生存期结果相当,且PPX方案更便捷。