• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎板成形术及后路器械融合术后的C5神经根麻痹

C5 nerve root palsy after cervical laminoplasty and posterior fusion with instrumentation.

作者信息

Takemitsu Masakazu, Cheung Kenneth M C, Wong Yat Wa, Cheung Wai-Yuen, Luk Keith D K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):267-72. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812f6f54.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812f6f54
PMID:18525487
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive case series.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence and clinical characteristics of postoperative fifth cervical nerve root palsy (C5 palsy) in patients with cervical myelopathy treated by laminoplasty alone and laminoplasty with posterior instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In patients who have multilevel cervical myelopathy with reducible kyphosis or instability, the authors have performed laminoplasty together with instrumented fusion to restore lordosis and stability. There seems to be a high incidence of postoperative C5 palsy in these patients.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients with a mean age of 60.5 years and multilevel cervical myelopathy treated by laminoplasty from 1995 to 2005 were reviewed. Incidence, side, and severity of muscle weakness from patients with C5 palsy after posterior instrumented fusion (instrumented group) was compared with those without instrumentation (noninstrumented group). Radiologic parameters were assessed to identify predisposing factors.

RESULTS

Overall 10 of 73 (14%) patients developed the C5 palsy, of which 5 (50%) of 10 patients were in instrumented group, and 5 of 63 (8%) patients were in noninstrumented. Three of 5 (60%) had the palsy on the same side of the opened lamina in the instrumented group, in the same proportion as the noninstrumented. Three (60%) patients in instrumented group developed deltoid weakness grade 1, but none in the noninstrumented had weaker than grade 3. All of the palsied in the instrumented group recovered within 2 years after surgery without removal of implant. Of the 5 patients with the palsy in the instrumented group, 3 had anterolisthesis before surgery and posterior translation of C4 on C5 by the surgery, and no patient without the palsy had the anterolisthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior cervical fusion using instrumentation for restoration of lordotic alignment combined with laminoplasty is highly associated with severe postoperative C5 palsy in patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy and C4 anterolisthesis.

摘要

研究设计

连续病例系列。

目的

比较单纯椎板成形术与后路内固定椎板成形术治疗颈椎病患者术后第五颈神经根麻痹(C5麻痹)的发生率及临床特征。

背景资料总结

对于患有多节段颈椎病且后凸畸形可复位或不稳定的患者,作者进行了椎板成形术并结合器械融合以恢复前凸和稳定性。这些患者术后C5麻痹的发生率似乎较高。

方法

回顾了1995年至2005年接受椎板成形术治疗的73例平均年龄60.5岁的多节段颈椎病患者。比较后路器械融合术后(器械组)C5麻痹患者与未行器械融合患者(非器械组)肌肉无力的发生率、部位及严重程度。评估影像学参数以确定易感因素。

结果

73例患者中共有10例(14%)发生C5麻痹,其中器械组10例中有5例(50%),非器械组63例中有5例(8%)。器械组5例中有3例(60%)麻痹发生在打开椎板的同侧,与非器械组比例相同。器械组3例(60%)患者三角肌无力为1级,但非器械组无弱于3级的情况。器械组所有麻痹患者在术后2年内均未取出植入物而恢复。器械组5例麻痹患者中,3例术前存在椎体前滑脱,手术导致C4在C5上向后移位,而无麻痹的患者均无椎体前滑脱。

结论

对于多节段颈椎病和C4椎体前滑脱患者,使用器械进行颈椎后路融合以恢复前凸对线并结合椎板成形术与严重的术后C5麻痹高度相关。

相似文献

1
C5 nerve root palsy after cervical laminoplasty and posterior fusion with instrumentation.颈椎板成形术及后路器械融合术后的C5神经根麻痹
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jun;21(4):267-72. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812f6f54.
2
C-5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with instrumented posterior fusion.颈椎板切除术联合后路内固定融合术后的 C-5 麻痹。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jan;20(1):1-4. doi: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE12952. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
3
Outcomes and Related Factors of C5 Palsy Following Cervical Laminectomy With Instrumented Fusion Compared With Laminoplasty.与椎板成形术相比,颈椎后路椎板切除并器械融合术后C5麻痹的结局及相关因素
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(10):E574-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001343.
4
Preoperative Risk Factors of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Laminectomy and Fusion in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of 70 Consecutive Patients.脊髓型颈椎病患者行椎板切除融合术后C5神经根麻痹的术前危险因素:70例连续病例分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):419-424. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000505.
5
Prophylactic perioperative dexamethasone decreases the incidence of postoperative C5 palsies after a posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion.预防性围手术期地塞米松可降低后路颈椎板切除术和融合术后 C5 神经麻痹的发生率。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.031. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
Selective blocking laminoplasty in cervical laminectomy and fusion to prevent postoperative C5 palsy.颈椎板切除融合术中选择性阻断椎板成形术预防术后 C5 神经麻痹。
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):617-623. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Preventing C5 palsy after laminoplasty.预防椎板成形术后C5麻痹。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 1;28(17):1972-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083237.94535.46.
8
Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine.颈椎矢状位劈开椎板成形术后C5神经根麻痹
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1123-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067261.83984.73.
9
Multivariate analysis of C-5 palsy incidence after cervical posterior fusion with instrumentation.颈椎后路融合内固定术后 C5 神经麻痹发生率的多因素分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):103-10. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE11255. Epub 2012 May 25.
10
Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty: is the risk of postoperative C-5 palsy different?前路椎体切除术与后路椎板成形术:术后 C5 神经瘫痪的风险是否不同?
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct;31(4):E12. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.FOCUS11156.

引用本文的文献

1
C5 Nerve Palsy After Posterior Instrumentation and Decompression in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature.颈椎手术后路内固定与减压术后的C5神经麻痹:文献综述
Cureus. 2025 May 19;17(5):e84430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84430. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Epidemiology of Cervical Fracture/Cervical Spinal Cord Injury and Changes in Surgical Treatment Modalities in Elderly Individuals During a 10-year Period: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan.10年期间日本老年人群颈椎骨折/颈脊髓损伤的流行病学及外科治疗方式的变化:一项全国多中心研究
Global Spine J. 2024 Jun;14(5):1583-1594. doi: 10.1177/21925682231151643. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
A Risk Calculator for the Prediction of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Instrumented Cervical Fusion.
用于预测颈椎后路融合术后 C5 神经根麻痹的风险计算器。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;166:e703-e710. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.082. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
4
Risk factors for C palsy following the posterior spinal process-splitting laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a case control study.后纵韧带骨化症后路棘突劈开椎板成形术后C型麻痹的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(11):634. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1730.
5
Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament.后路单开门椎管扩大成形术与后路融合术治疗颈椎后纵韧带骨化症的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 14;12(1):748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1.
6
Robotic Shoulder Rehabilitation With the Hybrid Assistive Limb in a Patient With Delayed Recovery After Postoperative C5 Palsy: A Case Report.使用混合辅助肢体对一名术后C5麻痹恢复延迟患者进行机器人肩部康复:病例报告
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 14;12:676352. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.676352. eCollection 2021.
7
Risk Factors for Cervical Deformity After Posterior Cervical Decompression Surgery: A Multicenter Study.颈椎后路减压术后颈椎畸形的危险因素:一项多中心研究
Global Spine J. 2023 Jul;13(6):1457-1466. doi: 10.1177/21925682211036660. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
8
Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches.后纵韧带骨化症与其他类型退行性颈椎病的手术决策:前路与后路手术方式对比
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Dec 8;21(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03830-0.
9
Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies.颈椎后路减压融合术后并发症:发病率、危险因素及预防策略综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):323-333. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.01.
10
Epidemiology of C5 Palsy after Cervical Spine Surgery: A 21-Center Study.颈椎手术后C5麻痹的流行病学:一项21中心研究
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):558-562. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938142.071. Epub 2019 Sep 30.