Ghanem Khalil G, Moore Richard D, Rompalo Anne M, Erbelding Emily J, Zenilman Jonathan M, Gebo Kelly A
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 15;47(2):258-65. doi: 10.1086/589295.
Syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) frequently coexist in patients, but the effects of immunosuppression on the course of syphilis are unknown. Our goal was to determine whether the degree of HIV-mediated immunosuppression and the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy impact syphilis serologic responses.
We assessed all cases of syphilis with positive serologic test results from 1990 through 2006 in a prospective, observational clinical cohort of HIV-infected patients. We defined seroreversion as the loss of reactivity in a patient who previously had a serologic test result positive for syphilis. We defined serologic failure as the lack of a 4-fold decrease in rapid plasma reagin titers 270-365 days after therapy or a 4-fold increase in titers > or =30 days after therapy. We used Cox proportional hazards models with statistical adjustments for multiple failure instances.
One hundred eighty subjects experienced 231 cases of syphilis. The median follow-up time was 5.3 years. A total of 71 episodes of serologic failure were documented. A CD4 cell count of <200 cells/mL at the time of syphilis diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of serologic failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.88). The receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy was associated with a 60% reduction in the rate of serologic failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.75), independent of concomitant CD4 cell response. Rapid plasma reagin seroreversion was infrequent (16.1%) and inconsistent, and it was more likely to occur among patients who received macrolides.
The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy to reverse immunosuppression and the routine use of macrolides for the prevention of opportunistic infections may reduce syphilis serologic failure rates among HIV-infected patients who have syphilis.
梅毒与人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)常共存于患者体内,但免疫抑制对梅毒病程的影响尚不清楚。我们的目标是确定HIV介导的免疫抑制程度以及高效抗逆转录病毒治疗的使用是否会影响梅毒血清学反应。
我们评估了1990年至2006年期间在一个前瞻性、观察性临床队列中血清学检测结果呈阳性的所有梅毒病例,该队列中的患者均感染了HIV。我们将血清学转阴定义为先前梅毒血清学检测结果呈阳性的患者失去反应性。我们将血清学治疗失败定义为治疗后270 - 365天快速血浆反应素滴度未降低4倍或治疗后≥30天滴度升高4倍。我们使用Cox比例风险模型对多个失败实例进行统计调整。
180名受试者出现了231例梅毒病例。中位随访时间为5.3年。共记录到71次血清学治疗失败事件。梅毒诊断时CD4细胞计数<200个/毫升与血清学治疗失败风险增加相关(调整后的风险比为2.48;95%置信区间为1.26 - 4.88)。接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗与血清学治疗失败率降低60%相关(调整后的风险比为0.40;95%置信区间为0.21 - 0.75),与同时出现的CD4细胞反应无关。快速血浆反应素血清学转阴情况不常见(16.1%)且不一致,并且更有可能发生在接受大环内酯类药物治疗的患者中。
使用高效抗逆转录病毒治疗来逆转免疫抑制以及常规使用大环内酯类药物预防机会性感染可能会降低感染梅毒的HIV感染者的梅毒血清学治疗失败率。