• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机化自适应测试中严重受限项目选择的最大优先级指数法。

The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.

作者信息

Cheng Ying, Chang Hua-Hua

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA.

出版信息

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 May;62(Pt 2):369-83. doi: 10.1348/000711008X304376. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1348/000711008X304376
PMID:18534047
Abstract

This paper introduces a new heuristic approach, the maximum priority index (MPI) method, for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. Our simulation study shows that it is able to accommodate various non-statistical constraints simultaneously, such as content balancing, exposure control, answer key balancing, and so on. Compared with the weighted deviation modelling method, it leads to fewer constraint violations and better exposure control while maintaining the same level of measurement precision.

摘要

本文介绍了一种新的启发式方法——最大优先级指数(MPI)方法,用于计算机化自适应测试中受严格约束的项目选择。我们的模拟研究表明,它能够同时适应各种非统计约束,如内容平衡、曝光控制、答案键平衡等。与加权偏差建模方法相比,它在保持相同测量精度水平的同时,能减少约束违反情况并实现更好的曝光控制。

相似文献

1
The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.计算机化自适应测试中严重受限项目选择的最大优先级指数法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 May;62(Pt 2):369-83. doi: 10.1348/000711008X304376. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
2
Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.计算机自适应测试中旋转题库与最大暴露率限制
Span J Psychol. 2008 Nov;11(2):618-25.
3
Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing.预测计算机自适应测试中的项目曝光参数。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 May;61(Pt 1):75-91. doi: 10.1348/000711006X129553.
4
a-Stratified CAT design with content blocking.具有内容分组的分层CAT设计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2003 Nov;56(Pt 2):359-78. doi: 10.1348/000711003770480084.
5
Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.多级设计中多组件仪器的最大可靠性估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 Feb;62(Pt 1):129-42. doi: 10.1348/000711007X255345. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
6
Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.计算机自适应测试中认知错误的多分类建模
J Appl Meas. 2001;2(4):356-78.
7
Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.计算机自适应测试:一种用于受限情况的混合项目选择方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2005 Nov;58(Pt 2):239-57. doi: 10.1348/000711005X62945.
8
CAT administration of language placement examinations.计算机辅助语言水平测试管理
J Appl Meas. 2000;1(3):292-302.
9
Computerized adaptive personality testing: a review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version.计算机化自适应人格测试:以明尼苏达多项人格问卷第二版计算机化自适应版本为例的综述
Psychol Assess. 2007 Mar;19(1):14-24. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.14.
10
Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.项目反应和反应时间模型的边缘似然推断。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Nov;63(Pt 3):603-26. doi: 10.1348/000711009X481360. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Maximin criterion for item selection in computerized adaptive testing.计算机化自适应测试中项目选择的极大极小准则。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 28;57(7):180. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02673-8.
2
Optimizing a national examination for medical undergraduates via modern automated test assembly approaches.通过现代自动化测试组装方法优化全国医学生考试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 25;24(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05905-1.
3
Location-Matching Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Technology-Enhanced Items.针对多分类技术增强型试题的位置匹配自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2024 Mar;48(1-2):57-76. doi: 10.1177/01466216241227548. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
4
Developing Computerized Adaptive Testing for a National Health Professionals Exam: An Attempt from Psychometric Simulations.开发全国卫生专业人员考试的计算机化自适应测验:心理计量学模拟的尝试。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Oct 31;12(1):462-471. doi: 10.5334/pme.855. eCollection 2023.
5
Item Selection With Collaborative Filtering in On-The-Fly Multistage Adaptive Testing.
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Nov;46(8):690-704. doi: 10.1177/01466216221124089. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
6
A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.一种在认知诊断计算机自适应测试中平衡测量准确性和属性覆盖率的新方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Oct;45(7-8):463-476. doi: 10.1177/01466216211040489. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
New Item Selection Method Accommodating Practical Constraints in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing: Maximum Deviation and Maximum Limitation Global Discrimination Indexes.认知诊断计算机化自适应测试中考虑实际约束的新项目选择方法:最大偏差和最大限制全局区分指数
Front Psychol. 2021 May 17;12:619771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619771. eCollection 2021.
8
Flexible Computerized Adaptive Tests to Detect Misconceptions and Estimate Ability Simultaneously.用于同时检测误解并估计能力的灵活计算机自适应测试
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jan;45(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/0146621620965730. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Attribute Discrimination Index-Based Method to Balance Attribute Coverage for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.基于属性区分指数的方法平衡短长度认知诊断计算机化自适应测试的属性覆盖率
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 28;11:224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00224. eCollection 2020.
10
Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Graded Response Model.等级反应模型下多分类项目的在线校准
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 23;10:3085. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03085. eCollection 2019.