Zhao Yongzhong, Epstein Richard J
Laboratory of Computational Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Aug;25(8):1737-49. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn126. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
Tumor suppressor genes are classified by their somatic behavior either as caretakers (CTs) that maintain DNA integrity or as gatekeepers (GKs) that regulate cell survival, but the germ line role of these disease-related gene subgroups may differ. To test this hypothesis, we have used genomic data mining to compare the features of human CTs (n = 38), GKs (n = 36), DNA repair genes (n = 165), apoptosis genes (n = 622), and their orthologs. This analysis reveals that repair genes are numerically less common than apoptosis genes in the genomes of multicellular organisms (P < 0.01), whereas CT orthologs are commoner than GK orthologs in unicellular organisms (P < 0.05). Gene targeting data show that CTs are less essential than GKs for survival of multicellular organisms (P < 0.0005) and that CT knockouts often permit offspring viability at the cost of male sterility. Patterns of human familial oncogenic mutations confirm that isolated CT loss is commoner than is isolated GK loss (P < 0.00001). In sexually reproducing species, CTs appear subject to less efficient purifying selection (i.e., higher Ka/Ks) than GKs (P = 0.000003); the faster evolution of CTs seems likely to be mediated by gene methylation and reduced transcription-coupled repair, based on differences in dinucleotide patterns (P = 0.001). These data suggest that germ line CT/repair gene function is relatively dispensable for survival, and imply that milder (e.g., epimutational) male prezygotic repair defects could enhance sperm variation-and hence environmental adaptation and speciation-while sparing fertility. We submit that CTs and repair genes are general targets for epigenetically initiated adaptive evolution, and propose a model in which human cancers arise in part as an evolutionarily programmed side effect of age- and damage-inducible genetic instability affecting both somatic and germ line lineages.
肿瘤抑制基因根据其体细胞行为可分为维持DNA完整性的守护者(CTs)或调节细胞存活的门卫(GK),但这些与疾病相关的基因亚组在种系中的作用可能不同。为了验证这一假设,我们使用基因组数据挖掘来比较人类CTs(n = 38)、GK(n = 36)、DNA修复基因(n = 165)、凋亡基因(n = 622)及其直系同源基因的特征。该分析表明,在多细胞生物的基因组中,修复基因在数量上比凋亡基因少见(P < 0.01),而在单细胞生物中,CT直系同源基因比GK直系同源基因更常见(P < 0.05)。基因靶向数据显示,对于多细胞生物的存活而言,CTs不如GK重要(P < 0.0005),并且CT基因敲除通常以雄性不育为代价允许后代存活。人类家族性致癌突变模式证实,孤立的CT缺失比孤立的GK缺失更常见(P < 0.00001)。在有性繁殖物种中,CTs似乎比GK受到的纯化选择效率更低(即更高的Ka/Ks)(P = 0.000003);基于二核苷酸模式的差异(P = 0.001),CTs更快的进化似乎可能由基因甲基化和转录偶联修复减少介导。这些数据表明种系CT/修复基因功能对于生存相对可有可无,并暗示较轻的(例如,表观突变的)雄性合子前修复缺陷可以增加精子变异,从而增强环境适应性和物种形成,同时保留生育能力。我们认为CTs和修复基因是表观遗传引发的适应性进化的一般靶点,并提出一个模型,其中人类癌症部分是由于影响体细胞和种系谱系的年龄和损伤诱导的遗传不稳定性的进化编程副作用而产生的。