Burke Bridget A, Latenser Barbara A
Division of Burns, Trauma, and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;29(4):580-4. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31817db84e.
The definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are not uniform despite the increasing awareness of IAH/ACS in burn patients. A short survey including definitions, resuscitation protocols, and monitoring practices was sent to every physician listed in the American Burn Association Directory. Thirty-two of 123 (26%) surveys were returned; 22 (69%) were from verified burn centers. Survey respondents said that bladder pressure indicating IAH is 19.6 mm Hg (range 12-30) and ACS is 25.9 mm Hg (range 15-40). Fifteen percentage of those responding do not include clinical sequellae in their definition of ACS. Bladder pressure is not routinely measured by 22 (69%) burn physicians, and staff at 17 centers (53%) wait until the abdomen is tense to measure abdominal pressure. Tense abdomen, along with elevated peak inspiratory pressures (PIP), is used in most centers (94%) to determine IAH/ACS, followed by oliguria (88%), and difficulty ventilating (78%). Resuscitation formulae used are primarily the Parkland/modified Parkland in 24 (75%) burn centers. Criteria for abdominal decompression is based on bladder pressures alone in 25 centers (78%); 16/32 (50%) use PIP, and 10/32 (31%) staff use other criteria including organ dysfunction or increased lactate. Eleven physicians (34%) advocate percutaneous decompression before decompressive laparotomy. Although most United States burn physicians define ACS as >or=25 mm Hg along with physiologic compromise, bladder pressure is routinely measured by only 31% of burn physicians. Most burn staff do not differentiate between IAH and ACS. Consensus definitions of IAH/ACS are necessary for burn care practitioners to compare research studies and discuss outcomes. Concise definitions will promote understanding of the pathophysiological processes involved and allow us to develop data-driven patient care protocols.
尽管烧伤患者对腹内高压(IAH)和腹腔间隔室综合征(ACS)的认识有所提高,但它们的定义并不统一。一项简短的调查,内容包括定义、复苏方案和监测方法,已发送给美国烧伤协会名录中列出的每位医生。123份调查问卷中有32份(26%)被退回;22份(69%)来自经过认证的烧伤中心。参与调查的受访者表示,提示IAH的膀胱压力为19.6毫米汞柱(范围12 - 30),提示ACS的膀胱压力为25.9毫米汞柱(范围15 - 40)。15%的受访者在其对ACS的定义中未纳入临床后遗症。22位(69%)烧伤科医生未常规测量膀胱压力,17个中心(53%)的工作人员要等到腹部变得紧绷时才测量腹内压。大多数中心(94%)使用腹部紧绷以及吸气峰压(PIP)升高来确定IAH/ACS,其次是少尿(88%)和通气困难(78%)。24个(75%)烧伤中心主要使用帕克兰公式/改良帕克兰公式进行复苏。25个中心(78%)腹部减压的标准仅基于膀胱压力;16/32(50%)使用PIP,10/32(31%)的工作人员使用其他标准,包括器官功能障碍或乳酸升高。11位医生(34%)主张在剖腹减压术前进行经皮减压。尽管大多数美国烧伤科医生将ACS定义为≥25毫米汞柱并伴有生理功能损害,但只有31%的烧伤科医生常规测量膀胱压力。大多数烧伤科工作人员未区分IAH和ACS。IAH/ACS的共识定义对于烧伤护理从业者比较研究和讨论结果是必要的。简洁的定义将促进对所涉及病理生理过程的理解,并使我们能够制定以数据为依据的患者护理方案。