Inoue Takeo, Koyasu Haruki, Hattori Satoru
Aichi Shikatsu Health Center, 114 Shikata Nishimuramae, Kitanagoya-shi, Aichi 481-0004, Japan.
Kekkaku. 2008 May;83(5):403-9.
To elucidate TB transmission with multiple secondary patients (MSP) in comparison with a single secondary patient (SSP).
The subjects of this retrospective study were 10,088 TB patients registered in Aichi Prefecture between 1989 and 2003. Pulmonary TB was found in 8,629 patients, and 1,459 had extra-pulmonary TB. Bacteriological examination revealed sputum smear-positive (SPBP) in 3,332, sputum smear-negative bacillus-positive (SNBP) in 2,139, and smear-negative bacillus-negative (SNBN) in 3,158. All registration files were reviewed to identify epidemiological links of patients. When linked patients with an interval of the dates of registration of less than 10 years were found, the first case was considered as the index case, and the other patients were regarded as secondary cases. An index case rate (ICR) for a category of patients was defined as following; ICR=NI/NA, where NA: Number of TB patients in a category A, and NI: Number of index cases in category A. An epidemic source rate (ESR) was used instead of ICR when the index case and the TB patients in a category were smear-positive.
A total of 337 patients were considered as index cases. Sixty-nine patients had MSP, while 268 had a SSP. The ICRs for MSP were 1.74% for the SPBP patients, 0.33% for the SNBP patients, 0.06% for the SNBN patients, and 0.14 % for the exrtra-pulmonary TB patients. These ICRs for SSP were 5.43%, 1.73%, 1.14%, and 0.96%, respectively. The ESR differences with MSP were highly significant (p<0.001) between patients aged 0-59 and those aged 60-99 (3.8% vs 0.5%), between patients with cavitary lesion and those with non-cavitary lesion (2.6% vs 0.4%), and between patients with large amount of bacilli and those with small amount of bacilli (2.9% vs 0.9%). These differences were also found in those with SSP.
These findings suggest that TB transmission with multiple secondary patients is closely correlated with aging, cavitary lesion, and bacillary amount, and that no characteristic changes were found between index cases with multiple secondary patients and those with a single secondary patient.
与单一继发患者(SSP)相比,阐明多重继发患者(MSP)的结核病传播情况。
本回顾性研究的对象为1989年至2003年期间在爱知县登记的10088例结核病患者。其中8629例为肺结核患者,1459例为肺外结核患者。细菌学检查显示,3332例痰涂片阳性(SPBP),2139例痰涂片阴性杆菌阳性(SNBP),3158例涂片阴性杆菌阴性(SNBN)。查阅所有登记档案以确定患者的流行病学关联。当发现登记日期间隔小于10年的关联患者时,将首例患者视为索引病例,其他患者视为继发病例。某类患者的索引病例率(ICR)定义如下:ICR = NI / NA,其中NA:A类结核病患者数量,NI:A类索引病例数量。当索引病例和某类结核病患者痰涂片阳性时,使用传染源率(ESR)代替ICR。
共有337例患者被视为索引病例。69例有多重继发患者,268例有单一继发患者。多重继发患者的痰涂片阳性患者的ICR为1.74%,痰涂片阴性杆菌阳性患者为0.33%,涂片阴性杆菌阴性患者为0.06%,肺外结核患者为0.14%。单一继发患者的这些ICR分别为5.43%、1.73%、1.14%和0.96%。0至59岁患者与60至99岁患者(3.8%对0.5%)、有空洞病变患者与无空洞病变患者(2.6%对0.4%)、大量杆菌患者与少量杆菌患者(2.9%对0.9%)之间,多重继发患者的ESR差异具有高度显著性(p < 0.001)。单一继发患者也存在这些差异。
这些发现表明,多重继发患者的结核病传播与年龄、空洞病变和杆菌数量密切相关,且多重继发患者的索引病例与单一继发患者的索引病例之间未发现特征性变化。