Suppr超能文献

印楝素 -A、四氢印楝素 -A、NeemAzal和硫丹对秋葵(黄秋葵)主要害虫的田间防效

Field efficacy of azadirachtin-A, tetrahydroazadirachtin-A, NeemAzal and endosulfan against key pests of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus).

作者信息

Dhingra Swaran, Walia Suresh, Kumar Jitendra, Singh Shivendra, Singh Gyanendra, Parmar Balraj S

机构信息

Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India.

出版信息

Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Nov;64(11):1187-94. doi: 10.1002/ps.1615.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

BACKGROUND Unlike synthetic pesticides, azadirachtin-based neem pesticides are environmentally friendly and are well known for their diverse pest control properties. Their use is, however, limited by the instability of azadirachtin, necessitating application at short intervals. The efficacy of relatively stable tetrahydroazadirachtin-A, therefore, needed to be established under field conditions.

RESULTS

Azadirachtin-A (Aza-A), its stable derivative tetrahydroazadirachtin-A (THA) and other neem pesticides have been evaluated for their field efficacy against major insect pests of okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench., during summer (kharif) 2003 and 2004. The optimum doses of Aza-A and THA against the fruit borer, Earias vittella F., were also established. Reductions in population of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.), and leafhopper (jassid), Amrasca biguttulla biguttulla Ishida, after application of THA or endosulfan was evident up to 10 days after treatment (DAT), whereas with Aza-A and NeemAzal (NZ) the effect was observed up to 7 DAT only. Endosulfan and THA also caused higher reduction in the larvae of shoot and fruit borer E. vittella and E. insulana Boisd., and recorded the highest yields of 4600 and 4180 kg ha(-1). The efficacy of THA (0.05 g L(-1) emulsion) was comparable with that of 0.5 g L(-1) endosulfan emulsion in reducing fruit borer infestation, the reduction over the control being 86.0 and 87.3%, 84.9 and 94.1% and 90.2 and 92.6% at first, second and third picking. THA 0.02 g L(-1) and Aza-A 0.05 g L(-1) were on a par. Laboratory-made neem oil emulsifiable concentrate was the least effective, but was superior to untreated check.

CONCLUSION

Three consecutive sprays of THA, a neem-based biopesticide, and endosulfan have been found to be superior in controlling field pests of okra to Aza-A and NZ, which were on a par. THA thus holds potential as a component of pest management strategies against okra pests.

摘要

未标注

背景 与合成农药不同,印楝素基印楝农药对环境友好,且以其多样的害虫防治特性而闻名。然而,其使用受到印楝素不稳定性的限制,需要短间隔施用。因此,需要在田间条件下确定相对稳定的四氢印楝素 - A的功效。

结果

在2003年和2004年夏季(季风季节),对印楝素 - A(Aza - A)、其稳定衍生物四氢印楝素 - A(THA)和其他印楝农药针对秋葵(黄秋葵,锦葵科)主要害虫的田间功效进行了评估。还确定了Aza - A和THA针对棉铃虫(棉红铃虫)的最佳剂量。施用THA或硫丹后,粉虱(烟粉虱)和叶蝉(棉叶蝉)种群数量在处理后10天内明显减少,而施用Aza - A和印楝素乳油(NZ)仅在处理后7天内观察到效果。硫丹和THA还使嫩梢和果实害虫棉铃虫和埃及棉铃虫的幼虫数量有更高程度的减少,并记录到最高产量分别为4600和4180千克/公顷。在减少棉铃虫侵害方面,THA(0.05克/升乳液)的功效与0.5克/升硫丹乳液相当,在第一次、第二次和第三次采摘时,相对于对照的减少率分别为86.0%和87.3%、84.9%和94.1%以及90.2%和92.6%。0.02克/升的THA和0.05克/升的Aza - A效果相当。实验室自制的印楝油乳油效果最差,但优于未处理对照。

结论

已发现连续三次喷洒基于印楝的生物农药THA和硫丹在控制秋葵田间害虫方面优于Aza - A和NZ,后两者效果相当。因此,THA作为秋葵害虫害虫管理策略的一个组成部分具有潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验