Sweidan Mary, Mahfoud Ziyad, DeJong Jocelyn
World Health Organization/Jordan.
Stud Fam Plann. 2008 Mar;39(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00151.x.
We investigated reported policies and practices of normal delivery in Jordanian hospitals to assess whether these practices are evidence-based and whether women are given choices in delivery. Staff at a nationally representative sample of 30 hospitals were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. The surveyed hospitals were found to be well equipped to deal with obstetric emergencies, and many follow evidence-based procedures. The internal evaluation system, however, typically is based on team feedback, and 20 percent of hospitals reported having no internal evaluation procedure. Some unnecessary procedures, including pubic shaving and enemas, are frequently practiced. Women are restricted in their movement during labor, and the lithotomy position is usually adopted for delivery; the majority of hospitals report strapping women in the delivery position. Most hospitals do not allow social support during labor and delivery. Measures are needed to encourage the best evidence-based practices regarding normal childbirth, including better evaluation. Jordanian women need much more information about their delivery options so that they can exercise their preferences wherever possible.
我们调查了约旦医院中报告的正常分娩政策和做法,以评估这些做法是否基于证据,以及女性在分娩过程中是否有选择权。我们使用半结构化问卷对全国具有代表性的30家医院的工作人员进行了访谈。调查发现,这些医院具备良好的设备来应对产科紧急情况,并且许多医院遵循基于证据的程序。然而,内部评估系统通常基于团队反馈,20%的医院报告称没有内部评估程序。一些不必要的程序,包括剃阴毛和灌肠,仍经常实施。女性在分娩过程中的活动受到限制,分娩时通常采用截石位;大多数医院报告称会将女性固定在分娩体位。大多数医院不允许在分娩过程中有社会支持人员在场。需要采取措施鼓励采用关于正常分娩的最佳循证做法,包括进行更好的评估。约旦女性需要更多关于分娩选择的信息,以便她们能够尽可能地行使自己的选择权。