• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在航空和地面运输过程中,作用于采用标准固定技术稳定病情的患者身上的力。

Forces acting during air and ground transport on patients stabilized by standard immobilization techniques.

作者信息

Silbergleit R, Dedrick D K, Pape J, Burney R E

机构信息

Section of Emergency Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Aug;20(8):875-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81429-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81429-5
PMID:1854071
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transportation, whether by air or ground, exposes the injured patient to mechanical shocks and vibrations. These forces and their hazardous potential remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify, characterize, and compare the forces generated during patient transport in helicopter and ground ambulances.

METHODS

Forces generated during transport were measured using an instrumented, low mass triaxial accelerometer fixed to a standard backboard. Measurements were recorded in three axes with an adult subject immobilized on the board during experimental ambulance and helicopter trials. Acceleration waveforms were analyzed in each mode of transport.

RESULTS

Forces for both ground and air transport ranged 0.07g to 0.19g root mean square, and 0.32g to 0.83g mean peak. The vibrational forces in the helicopter were fairly discrete, located at 6.6, 19.5, and 39 Hz, and axis dependent. Ground ambulance vibrations were more diffuse, occurring below 1 Hz and between 10 and 15 Hz. Crest factor analysis shows that shocks were more uniform in the helicopter than on the ground, especially in the anterior-posterior axis.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that transportation by helicopter subjects supine patients to greater lateral and vertical forces, but smaller head to toe forces, than ground transportation (P less than .05). In general, the forces to which a backboarded subject is subjected during transport range from 0.32g to 0.83g, vary by direction, and are more predictable for air than for ground transport. The clinical significance of these measurements requires further study.

摘要

目的

无论是通过空中还是地面运输,受伤患者都会受到机械冲击和振动。这些力及其潜在危害在很大程度上仍不为人知。本研究的目的是识别、表征和比较直升机和地面救护车在运送患者过程中产生的力。

方法

使用固定在标准背板上的仪器化低质量三轴加速度计测量运输过程中产生的力。在实验性救护车和直升机试验期间,将一名成年受试者固定在背板上,在三个轴上进行测量。对每种运输方式下的加速度波形进行分析。

结果

地面和空中运输的力的均方根范围为0.07g至0.19g,平均峰值范围为0.32g至0.83g。直升机中的振动力相当离散,位于6.6、19.5和39Hz,且与轴相关。地面救护车的振动更为分散,发生在1Hz以下以及10至15Hz之间。波峰因数分析表明,直升机中的冲击比地面上更为均匀,尤其是在前后轴上。

结论

这些数据表明,与地面运输相比,直升机运输使仰卧患者承受更大的横向和垂直力,但头到脚的力较小(P小于0.05)。一般来说,使用背板的受试者在运输过程中承受的力范围为0.32g至0.83g,因方向而异,并且空中运输比地面运输更具可预测性。这些测量结果的临床意义需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Forces acting during air and ground transport on patients stabilized by standard immobilization techniques.在航空和地面运输过程中,作用于采用标准固定技术稳定病情的患者身上的力。
Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Aug;20(8):875-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81429-5.
2
When is the helicopter faster? A comparison of helicopter and ground ambulance transport times.直升机何时速度更快?直升机与地面救护车转运时间的比较。
J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):148-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000124264.43941.41.
3
Cerebral Oxygenation and Acceleration in Pediatric and Neonatal Interfacility Transport.儿科和新生儿院间转运中的脑氧合与加速
Air Med J. 2016 May-Jun;35(3):156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
4
A comparison of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the scene.直升机和地面救护车转运与从现场转运的创伤患者损伤结局之间关联的比较。
J Trauma. 1997 Dec;43(6):940-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00013.
5
Mechanical vibration and sound levels experienced in neonatal transport.新生儿转运过程中所经历的机械振动和声音水平。
Am J Dis Child. 1984 Oct;138(10):967-70. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1984.02140480069021.
6
Pacemaker function during helicopter transport.直升机转运期间的起搏器功能。
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Mar;18(3):305-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80419-6.
7
Air versus ground transport of the major trauma patient: a natural experiment.空运与地面转运严重创伤患者:一项自然实验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):45-50. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349788.
8
Evaluation of ground ambulance, rotor-wing, and fixed-wing aircraft services.地面救护车、旋翼机和固定翼飞机服务的评估。
Crit Care Clin. 1992 Jul;8(3):533-64.
9
Effectiveness of helicopter versus ground ambulance services for interfacility transport.直升机与地面救护车用于机构间转运的效果比较
J Trauma. 1998 Oct;45(4):785-90. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199810000-00031.
10
Comparison of air and ground transport of cardiac patients.心脏病患者航空与地面运输的比较。
Air Med J. 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):33-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of the Long Spine Board From Clinical Practice: A Historical Perspective.从临床实践中移除长脊板:历史视角。
J Athl Train. 2018 Aug;53(8):752-755. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-462-17. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
2
Helicopter "Drip and Ship" Flights Do Not Alter the Pharmacological Integrity of rtPA.直升机“点滴与运送”飞行不会改变重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)的药理完整性。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Oct;27(10):2720-2724. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.049. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
3
Lightweight physiologic sensor performance during pre-hospital care delivered by ambulance clinicians.
救护车临床医生在院前护理期间的轻型生理传感器性能。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Feb;30(1):23-32. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9673-z. Epub 2015 Mar 25.