Eagle Dawn M, Bari Andrea, Robbins Trevor W
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Site, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Aug;199(3):439-56. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1127-6. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
The term 'action inhibition' encapsulates the ability to prevent any form of planned physical response. Growing evidence suggests that different 'stages' or even subtypes of action inhibition activate subtly different neuropharmacological and neuroanatomical processes.
In this review, we present evidence from two commonly used and apparently similar behavioural tests, the stop-signal task and the go/no-go task, to determine if these have similar neuroanatomical and neurochemical modulation.
Whilst performance of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks is modulated across only subtly different anatomical networks, serotonin (5-HT) is strongly implicated in inhibitory control on the go/no-go but not the stop-signal task, whereas the stop-signal reaction time appears more sensitive to the action of noradrenaline.
There is clear neuropharmacological and neuroanatomical evidence that stop-signal and go/no-go tasks represent different forms of action inhibition. This evidence translates with remarkable consistency across species. We discuss the possible implications of this evidence with respect to the development of novel therapeutic treatments for disorders in which inhibitory deficits are prominent and debilitating.
“动作抑制”一词涵盖了阻止任何形式的计划好的身体反应的能力。越来越多的证据表明,动作抑制的不同“阶段”甚至亚型会激活略有不同的神经药理学和神经解剖学过程。
在本综述中,我们展示了来自两种常用且看似相似的行为测试(停止信号任务和去/不去任务)的证据,以确定它们是否具有相似的神经解剖学和神经化学调节。
虽然停止信号任务和去/不去任务的表现仅在略有不同的解剖网络中受到调节,但血清素(5-HT)与去/不去任务中的抑制控制密切相关,而与停止信号任务无关,而停止信号反应时间似乎对去甲肾上腺素的作用更敏感。
有明确的神经药理学和神经解剖学证据表明,停止信号任务和去/不去任务代表了不同形式的动作抑制。这一证据在不同物种间具有显著的一致性。我们讨论了这一证据对于开发针对抑制缺陷突出且使人衰弱的疾病的新型治疗方法可能具有的意义。