La Touche R, Escalante K, Linares M T, Mesa J
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad San Pablo CEU, Facultad de Medicina, Madrid, España.
Rev Neurol. 2008;46(12):714-8.
To make a review and analysis of articles that used physical therapy methods for peripheral facial paralysis (PFP).
The articles were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro y CINAHL data bases. The inclusion criteria used for the selection of the articles were: randomized controlled trials, studies in which patients suffered from PFP, studies in which physical therapy interventions were used for PFP treatment, studies published in periodic journals in between the years of 1970 and 2007, studies published in English. There were two independently reviewers that assessed the quality of the studies thanks to the Jadad scale and finally selected six randomized controlled trials.
Four of six selected articles showed acceptable methodological quality and five of them described movement and facial symmetry improvements, as so as prevention and decrease of synkinesis.
The results of our systematic review study can be very helpful for clinical decision purposes and further clinical trials. However, we consider that it's necessary to reproduce all of the studies selected but with certain methodological adjustments. We recommend that further studies investigate the most effective treatment parameters for adequate PFP treatment.
对采用物理治疗方法治疗周围性面瘫(PFP)的文章进行综述与分析。
在MEDLINE、EMBASE、PEDro和CINAHL数据库中检索文章。用于文章选择的纳入标准为:随机对照试验、患者患有周围性面瘫的研究、采用物理治疗干预措施治疗周围性面瘫的研究、1970年至2007年间发表在定期期刊上的研究、以英文发表的研究。有两名独立的评审员借助Jadad量表评估研究质量,最终选定六项随机对照试验。
六项选定文章中有四项显示出可接受的方法学质量,其中五项描述了运动和面部对称性改善情况以及联带运动的预防和减少。
我们的系统综述研究结果对临床决策和进一步的临床试验可能非常有帮助。然而,我们认为有必要重复所有选定的研究,但需进行某些方法学调整。我们建议进一步的研究调查足够治疗周围性面瘫的最有效治疗参数。