Weibel Stephanie, Rücker Gerta, Eberhart Leopold Hj, Pace Nathan L, Hartl Hannah M, Jordan Olivia L, Mayer Debora, Riemer Manuel, Schaefer Maximilian S, Raj Diana, Backhaus Insa, Helf Antonia, Schlesinger Tobias, Kienbaum Peter, Kranke Peter
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia and surgery. Up to 80% of patients may be affected. These outcomes are a major cause of patient dissatisfaction and may lead to prolonged hospital stay and higher costs of care along with more severe complications. Many antiemetic drugs are available for prophylaxis. They have various mechanisms of action and side effects, but there is still uncertainty about which drugs are most effective with the fewest side effects. OBJECTIVES: • To compare the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic pharmacologic interventions (antiemetic drugs) against no treatment, against placebo, or against each other (as monotherapy or combination prophylaxis) for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia • To generate a clinically useful ranking of antiemetic drugs (monotherapy and combination prophylaxis) based on efficacy and safety • To identify the best dose or dose range of antiemetic drugs in terms of efficacy and safety SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. The first search was performed in November 2017 and was updated in April 2020. In the update of the search, 39 eligible studies were found that were not included in the analysis (listed as awaiting classification). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing effectiveness or side effects of single antiemetic drugs in any dose or combination against each other or against an inactive control in adults undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia. All antiemetic drugs belonged to one of the following substance classes: 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, D₂ receptor antagonists, NK₁ receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and anticholinergics. No language restrictions were applied. Abstract publications were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A review team of 11 authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias and subsequently extracted data. We performed pair-wise meta-analyses for drugs of direct interest (amisulpride, aprepitant, casopitant, dexamethasone, dimenhydrinate, dolasetron, droperidol, fosaprepitant, granisetron, haloperidol, meclizine, methylprednisolone, metoclopramide, ondansetron, palonosetron, perphenazine, promethazine, ramosetron, rolapitant, scopolamine, and tropisetron) compared to placebo (inactive control). We performed network meta-analyses (NMAs) to estimate the relative effects and ranking (with placebo as reference) of all available single drugs and combinations. Primary outcomes were vomiting within 24 hours postoperatively, serious adverse events (SAEs), and any adverse event (AE). Secondary outcomes were drug class-specific side effects (e.g. headache), mortality, early and late vomiting, nausea, and complete response. We performed subgroup network meta-analysis with dose of drugs as a moderator variable using dose ranges based on previous consensus recommendations. We assessed certainty of evidence of NMA treatment effects for all primary outcomes and drug class-specific side effects according to GRADE (CINeMA, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis). We restricted GRADE assessment to single drugs of direct interest compared to placebo. MAIN RESULTS: We included 585 studies (97,516 randomized participants). Most of these studies were small (median sample size of 100); they were published between 1965 and 2017 and were primarily conducted in Asia (51%), Europe (25%), and North America (16%). Mean age of the overall population was 42 years. Most participants were women (83%), had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II (70%), received perioperative opioids (88%), and underwent gynaecologic (32%) or gastrointestinal surgery (19%) under general anaesthesia using volatile anaesthetics (88%). In this review, 44 single drugs and 51 drug combinations were compared. Most studies investigated only single drugs (72%) and included an inactive control arm (66%). The three most investigated single drugs in this review were ondansetron (246 studies), dexamethasone (120 studies), and droperidol (97 studies). Almost all studies (89%) reported at least one efficacy outcome relevant for this review. However, only 56% reported at least one relevant safety outcome. Altogether, 157 studies (27%) were assessed as having overall low risk of bias, 101 studies (17%) overall high risk of bias, and 327 studies (56%) overall unclear risk of bias. Vomiting within 24 hours postoperatively Relative effects from NMA for vomiting within 24 hours (282 RCTs, 50,812 participants, 28 single drugs, and 36 drug combinations) suggest that 29 out of 36 drug combinations and 10 out of 28 single drugs showed a clinically important benefit (defined as the upper end of the 95% confidence interval (CI) below a risk ratio (RR) of 0.8) compared to placebo. Combinations of drugs were generally more effective than single drugs in preventing vomiting. However, single NK₁ receptor antagonists showed treatment effects similar to most of the drug combinations. High-certainty evidence suggests that the following single drugs reduce vomiting (ordered by decreasing efficacy): aprepitant (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.38, high certainty, rank 3/28 of single drugs); ramosetron (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.59, high certainty, rank 5/28); granisetron (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.54, high certainty, rank 6/28); dexamethasone (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.57, high certainty, rank 8/28); and ondansetron (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.60, high certainty, rank 13/28). Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that the following single drugs probably reduce vomiting: fosaprepitant (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21, moderate certainty, rank 1/28) and droperidol (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69, moderate certainty, rank 20/28). Recommended and high doses of granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol showed clinically important benefit, but low doses showed no clinically important benefit. Aprepitant was used mainly at high doses, ramosetron at recommended doses, and fosaprepitant at doses of 150 mg (with no dose recommendation available). Frequency of SAEs Twenty-eight RCTs were included in the NMA for SAEs (10,766 participants, 13 single drugs, and eight drug combinations). The certainty of evidence for SAEs when using one of the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol compared to placebo) ranged from very low to low. Droperidol (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08 to 9.71, low certainty, rank 6/13) may reduce SAEs. We are uncertain about the effects of aprepitant (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 7.36, very low certainty, rank 11/13), ramosetron (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.05 to 15.74, very low certainty, rank 7/13), granisetron (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 13.15, very low certainty, rank 10/13), dexamethasone (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.28 to 4.85, very low certainty, rank 9/13), and ondansetron (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.32 to 8.10, very low certainty, rank 12/13). No studies reporting SAEs were available for fosaprepitant. Frequency of any AE Sixty-one RCTs were included in the NMA for any AE (19,423 participants, 15 single drugs, and 11 drug combinations). The certainty of evidence for any AE when using one of the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol compared to placebo) ranged from very low to moderate. Granisetron (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05, moderate certainty, rank 7/15) probably has no or little effect on any AE. Dexamethasone (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.08, low certainty, rank 2/15) and droperidol (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, low certainty, rank 6/15) may reduce any AE. Ondansetron (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01, low certainty, rank 9/15) may have little or no effect on any AE. We are uncertain about the effects of aprepitant (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, very low certainty, rank 3/15) and ramosetron (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.54, very low certainty, rank 11/15) on any AE. No studies reporting any AE were available for fosaprepitant. Class-specific side effects For class-specific side effects (headache, constipation, wound infection, extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, arrhythmia, and QT prolongation) of relevant substances, the certainty of evidence for the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs mostly ranged from very low to low. Exceptions were that ondansetron probably increases headache (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28, moderate certainty, rank 18/23) and probably reduces sedation (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96, moderate certainty, rank 5/24) compared to placebo. The latter effect is limited to recommended and high doses of ondansetron. Droperidol probably reduces headache (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86, moderate certainty, rank 5/23) compared to placebo. We have high-certainty evidence that dexamethasone (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.09, high certainty, rank 16/24) has no effect on sedation compared to placebo. No studies assessed substance class-specific side effects for fosaprepitant. Direction and magnitude of network effect estimates together with level of evidence certainty are graphically summarized for all pre-defined GRADE-relevant outcomes and all drugs of direct interest compared to placebo in http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4066353. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found high-certainty evidence that five single drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, and ondansetron) reduce vomiting, and moderate-certainty evidence that two other single drugs (fosaprepitant and droperidol) probably reduce vomiting, compared to placebo. Four of the six substance classes (5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, D₂ receptor antagonists, NK₁ receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids) were thus represented by at least one drug with important benefit for prevention of vomiting. Combinations of drugs were generally more effective than the corresponding single drugs in preventing vomiting. NK₁ receptor antagonists were the most effective drug class and had comparable efficacy to most of the drug combinations. 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists were the best studied substance class. For most of the single drugs of direct interest, we found only very low to low certainty evidence for safety outcomes such as occurrence of SAEs, any AE, and substance class-specific side effects. Recommended and high doses of granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol were more effective than low doses for prevention of vomiting. Dose dependency of side effects was rarely found due to the limited number of studies, except for the less sedating effect of recommended and high doses of ondansetron. The results of the review are transferable mainly to patients at higher risk of nausea and vomiting (i.e. healthy women undergoing inhalational anaesthesia and receiving perioperative opioids). Overall study quality was limited, but certainty assessments of effect estimates consider this limitation. No further efficacy studies are needed as there is evidence of moderate to high certainty for seven single drugs with relevant benefit for prevention of vomiting. However, additional studies are needed to investigate potential side effects of these drugs and to examine higher-risk patient populations (e.g. individuals with diabetes and heart disease).
背景:术后恶心呕吐(PONV)是麻醉和手术常见的不良反应。高达80%的患者可能会受到影响。这些结果是患者不满的主要原因,可能导致住院时间延长、护理成本增加以及更严重的并发症。有多种止吐药物可用于预防。它们有不同的作用机制和副作用,但对于哪种药物最有效且副作用最少仍存在不确定性。 目的:• 比较不同预防性药物干预(止吐药物)与不治疗、与安慰剂或相互之间(作为单一疗法或联合预防)在全身麻醉下接受任何类型手术的成人中预防术后恶心呕吐的疗效和安全性 • 根据疗效和安全性生成一份临床上有用的止吐药物(单一疗法和联合预防)排名 • 确定止吐药物在疗效和安全性方面的最佳剂量或剂量范围 检索方法:我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、Embase、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)、ClinicalTrials.gov以及相关系统评价的参考文献列表。首次检索于2017年11月进行,并于2020年4月更新。在更新检索时,发现39项符合条件的研究未纳入分析(列为待分类)。 入选标准:随机对照试验(RCT),比较单一止吐药物在任何剂量或联合使用时相互之间或与无活性对照在全身麻醉下接受任何类型手术的成人中的有效性或副作用。所有止吐药物属于以下物质类别之一:5-HT₃受体拮抗剂、D₂受体拮抗剂、NK₁受体拮抗剂、皮质类固醇、抗组胺药和抗胆碱能药。不设语言限制。排除摘要出版物。 数据收集与分析:由11位作者组成的综述团队独立评估试验是否纳入以及偏倚风险,随后提取数据。我们对直接感兴趣的药物(阿立哌唑、阿瑞匹坦、卡索匹坦、地塞米松、茶苯海明、多拉司琼、氟哌利多、福沙匹坦、格拉司琼、氟哌啶醇、美克洛嗪、甲泼尼龙、甲氧氯普胺、昂丹司琼、帕洛诺司琼、奋乃静、异丙嗪、雷莫司琼、罗拉匹坦、东莨菪碱和托烷司琼)与安慰剂(无活性对照)进行了成对荟萃分析。我们进行了网状荟萃分析(NMA)以估计所有可用单一药物和联合用药的相对效应和排名(以安慰剂为参照)。主要结局为术后24小时内呕吐、严重不良事件(SAE)和任何不良事件(AE)。次要结局为药物类别特异性副作用(如头痛)、死亡率、早期和晚期呕吐、恶心以及完全缓解。我们以药物剂量作为调节变量,根据先前的共识推荐使用剂量范围进行亚组网状荟萃分析。我们根据GRADE(CINeMA,网状荟萃分析的置信度)评估了所有主要结局和药物类别特异性副作用的NMA治疗效应的证据确定性。我们将GRADE评估限制在与安慰剂相比直接感兴趣的单一药物。 主要结果:我们纳入了585项研究(97,516名随机参与者)。这些研究大多规模较小(中位数样本量为100);它们发表于1965年至2017年之间,主要在亚洲(51%)、欧洲(25%)和北美(16%)进行。总体人群的平均年龄为42岁。大多数参与者为女性(83%),美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级(70%),接受围手术期阿片类药物治疗(88%),并在全身麻醉下使用挥发性麻醉剂(88%)接受妇科手术(32%)或胃肠道手术(19%)。在本综述中,比较了44种单一药物和51种联合用药。大多数研究仅调查单一药物(72%),并包括一个无活性对照臂(66%)。本综述中研究最多的三种单一药物是昂丹司琼(246项研究)、地塞米松(120项研究)和氟哌利多(97项研究)。几乎所有研究(89%)都报告了至少一项与本综述相关的疗效结局。然而,只有56%报告了至少一项相关的安全性结局。总共,157项研究(27%)被评估为总体偏倚风险低,101项研究(17%)总体偏倚风险高,327项研究(56%)总体偏倚风险不明确。 术后24小时内呕吐:关于术后24小时内呕吐的NMA相对效应(282项RCT,50,812名参与者,28种单一药物和36种联合用药)表明,与安慰剂相比,36种联合用药中的29种和28种单一药物中的10种显示出临床上重要的益处(定义为95%置信区间(CI)上限低于风险比(RR)0.8)。联合用药通常比单一药物在预防呕吐方面更有效。然而,单一NK₁受体拮抗剂显示出与大多数联合用药相似的治疗效果。高确定性证据表明,以下单一药物可减少呕吐(按疗效从高到低排序):阿瑞匹坦(RR 0.26,95% CI 0.18至0.38,高确定性,单一药物排名第3/28);雷莫司琼(RR 0.44,95% CI 0.32至0.59,高确定性,排名第5/28);格拉司琼(RR 0.45,95% CI 0.38至0.54,高确定性,排名第6/28);地塞米松(RR 0.51,95% CI 0.44至0.57,高确定性,排名第8/28);昂丹司琼(RR 0.55,95% CI 0.51至0.60,高确定性,排名第13/28)。中等确定性证据表明,以下单一药物可能减少呕吐:福沙匹坦(RR 0.06,95% CI 0.02至0.21,中等确定性,排名第1/28)和氟哌利多(RR 0.61,95% CI 0.54至0.69,中等确定性,排名第20/28)。格拉司琼、地塞米松、昂丹司琼和氟哌利多的推荐剂量和高剂量显示出临床上重要的益处,但低剂量未显示出临床上重要的益处。阿瑞匹坦主要使用高剂量,雷莫司琼使用推荐剂量,福沙匹坦使用150 mg剂量(无可用剂量推荐)。 严重不良事件的发生率:NMA纳入了28项关于严重不良事件的RCT(10,766名参与者,13种单一药物和8种联合用药)。使用一种最佳且最可靠的止吐药物(阿瑞匹坦、雷莫司琼、格拉司琼、地塞米松、昂丹司琼和氟哌利多与安慰剂相比)时,严重不良事件证据的确定性范围从极低到低。氟哌利多(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.08至9.71,低确定性,排名第6/13)可能会减少严重不良事件。我们不确定阿瑞匹坦(RR 1.39,95% CI 0.26至7.36,极低确定性,排名第11/13)、雷莫司琼(RR 0.89,95% CI 0.05至15.74,极低确定性,排名第7/13)、格拉司琼(RR 1.21,95% CI 0.11至13.15,极低确定性,排名第10/13)、地塞米松(RR 1.16,95% CI 0.28至4.85,极低确定性,排名第9/13)和昂丹司琼(RR 1.62,95% CI 0.32至8.10,极低确定性,排名第12/13)的效果。没有关于福沙匹坦严重不良事件的研究报告。 任何不良事件的发生率:NMA纳入了61项关于任何不良事件的RCT(19,423名参与者,15种单一药物和11种联合用药)。使用一种最佳且最可靠的止吐药物(阿瑞匹坦、雷莫司琼、格拉司琼、地塞米松、昂丹司琼和氟哌利多与安慰剂相比)时,任何不良事件证据的确定性范围从极低到中等。格拉司琼(RR 0.92,95% CI 0.80至1.05,中等确定性,排名第7/15)可能对任何不良事件没有或几乎没有影响。地塞米松(RR 0.77,95% CI 0.55至1.08,低确定性,排名第2/15)和氟哌利多(RR 0.89,95% CI 0.81至0.98,低确定性,排名第6/15)可能会减少任何不良事件。昂丹司琼(RR 0.95,95% CI 0.88至1.01,低确定性,排名第9/15)可能对任何不良事件几乎没有或没有影响。我们不确定阿瑞匹坦(RR 0.87,95% CI 0.78至0.97,极低确定性,排名第3/15)和雷莫司琼(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.65至1.54,极低确定性,排名第11/15)对任何不良事件的影响。没有关于福沙匹坦任何不良事件的研究报告。 类别特异性副作用:对于相关物质的类别特异性副作用(头痛、便秘、伤口感染、锥体外系症状、镇静、心律失常和QT延长),最佳且最可靠的止吐药物的证据确定性大多范围从极低到低。例外情况是,与安慰剂相比,昂丹司琼可能会增加头痛(RR 1.16,95% CI 1.06至1.28,中等确定性,排名第18/23),并且可能会减少镇静(RR 0.87,95% CI 0.79至0.96,中等确定性,排名第5/24)。后一种效应仅限于昂丹司琼的推荐剂量和高剂量。与安慰剂相比,氟哌利多可能会减少头痛(RR 0.76,95% CI 0.67至0.86,中等确定性,排名第5/23)。我们有高确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,地塞米松(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.91至1.09,高确定性,排名第16/24)对镇静没有影响。没有研究评估福沙匹坦的物质类别特异性副作用。所有预定义的与GRADE相关的结局以及与安慰剂相比所有直接感兴趣药物的网状效应估计的方向和大小以及证据确定性水平在http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4066353中以图形方式进行了总结。 作者结论:我们发现高确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,五种单一药物(阿瑞匹坦、雷莫司琼、格拉司琼、地塞米松和昂丹司琼)可减少呕吐,中等确定性证据表明另外两种单一药物(福沙匹坦和氟哌利多)可能减少呕吐。六种物质类别中的四种(5-HT₃受体拮抗剂、D₂受体拮抗剂、NK₁受体拮抗剂和皮质类固醇)因此至少有一种药物对预防呕吐有重要益处。联合用药通常比相应的单一药物在预防呕吐方面更有效。NK₁受体拮抗剂是最有效的药物类别,其疗效与大多数联合用药相当。5-HT₃受体拮抗剂是研究最多的物质类别。对于大多数直接感兴趣的单一药物,我们发现关于严重不良事件、任何不良事件和物质类别特异性副作用等安全性结局的证据确定性仅为极低到低。格拉司琼、地塞米松、昂丹司琼和氟哌利多的推荐剂量和高剂量在预防呕吐方面比低剂量更有效。由于研究数量有限,除了昂丹司琼推荐剂量和高剂量的镇静作用较小外,很少发现副作用的剂量依赖性。本综述的结果主要适用于恶心呕吐风险较高的患者(即接受吸入麻醉并接受围手术期阿片类药物治疗的健康女性)。总体研究质量有限,但效应估计的确定性评估考虑了这一局限性。由于有七种单一药物有预防呕吐的相关益处,证据具有中等至高确定性,因此无需进一步的疗效研究。然而,需要进行额外的研究来调查这些药物的潜在副作用,并研究高风险患者群体(如糖尿病和心脏病患者)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-9-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-9-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-17
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-3-28
Cancers (Basel). 2025-3-24
Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2020-8