Davis R D, Schwartz R S
Department of General Dentistry, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, Lackland AFB, Texas.
Am J Dent. 1991 Apr;4(2):89-92.
This study compared the accuracy in three dimensions of casts made from complete-arch custom acrylic resin trays and two types of dual-arch impression trays. Using addition silicone impression material, 30 impressions (10/group) were made of a typodont. Reference marks on the typodont allowed measurements in the mesiodistal, buccolingual and occlusogingival dimensions. Gypsum casts were made and the distances between the reference marks on each cast were determined with a measuring microscope. The measurements from each cast were compared with one another and expressed as a percent deviation from the typodont measurements. Analysis with a two-way ANOVA and a Tukey B post hoc test established that the dual-arch trays were at least as accurate as the custom tray in every dimension measured.
本研究比较了由全牙弓定制丙烯酸树脂托盘和两种双牙弓印模托盘制作的模型在三个维度上的精度。使用加成型硅橡胶印模材料,对一个牙列模型制作了30个印模(每组10个)。牙列模型上的参考标记允许在近远中、颊舌和咬合龈维度上进行测量。制作石膏模型,并用测量显微镜确定每个模型上参考标记之间的距离。将每个模型的测量值相互比较,并表示为相对于牙列模型测量值的百分比偏差。双向方差分析和Tukey B事后检验分析表明,在每个测量维度上,双牙弓托盘至少与定制托盘一样精确。