Shafa Sina, Zaree Zeinab, Mosharraf Ramin
Isfahan University, Iran.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Sep 1;9(6):49-56.
In addition to the impression material, the type of impression tray influences the accurate dimensional transfer of the size and position of the teeth to the master cast. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of master casts produced from an alginate impression material using a visible-light-curing resin and autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate resin custom tray materials.
Two types of custom trays were fabricated from a stainless steel master model with three index studs. Twenty-two irreversible hydrocolloid impressions were made of the master model and then poured with a Type III dental stone. The distances between the reproduced index studs were measured to +/- 0.01 mm with a digital caliper. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and T-test were used for data analysis.
There were no significant differences between the two tray materials for any of the three distances. There were no statistical differences between the master model and the casts made from the two tray materials in the length dimension, but there were significant differences in the vertical dimension. In terms of the width dimension there was a significant difference only between the cold curing group and the master model.
Within the limitations of this study, the dimensions of stone casts poured from an impression made using a light-cured tray did not differ significantly from those created from impressions made using autopolymerizing acrylic trays. However, working dies from the light-curing tray impressions were more accurate buccolingually than those from the autopolymerizing acrylic trays.
The accuracy of master cast reproduction using visible-light-curing resin or an autopolymerizing polymethyl methacrylate resin custom tray material is acceptable. Although autopolymerizing resin materials require less equipment and are relatively more inexpensive, light-cure tray materials may be the material of choice for custom tray fabrication due to greater accuracy in the buccolingual dimension.
除印模材料外,印模托盘的类型也会影响牙齿的大小和位置向工作模型的精确尺寸传递。本研究的目的是确定使用可见光固化树脂和自凝聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯树脂定制托盘材料,由藻酸盐印模材料制作的工作模型的准确性。
用带有三个定位柱的不锈钢母模制作两种类型的定制托盘。对母模制作22个不可逆水胶体印模,然后用III型牙科石膏灌注。用数字卡尺测量复制的定位柱之间的距离,精确到±0.01毫米。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和T检验进行数据分析。
三种距离中的任何一种,两种托盘材料之间均无显著差异。两种托盘材料制作的模型与母模在长度尺寸上无统计学差异,但在垂直尺寸上有显著差异。在宽度尺寸方面,仅冷固化组与母模之间存在显著差异。
在本研究的局限性内,用光固化托盘制作的印模灌注的石膏模型尺寸与用自凝丙烯酸托盘制作的印模所产生的尺寸无显著差异。然而,光固化托盘印模制作的工作模型在颊舌向比自凝丙烯酸托盘制作的更精确。
使用可见光固化树脂或自凝聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯树脂定制托盘材料复制工作模型的准确性是可以接受的。尽管自凝树脂材料所需设备较少且相对便宜,但由于在颊舌向尺寸上更精确,光固化托盘材料可能是定制托盘制作的首选材料。