• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者转至一级创伤中心后的结局。

Outcomes of trauma patients after transfer to a level I trauma center.

作者信息

Rivara Frederick P, Koepsell Thomas D, Wang Jin, Nathens Avery, Jurkovich Gregory A, Mackenzie Ellen J

机构信息

Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1594-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493099.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493099
PMID:18545129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

: Trauma center physicians need to know the patient's prognosis to make appropriate clinical decisions when they take over the care of a transferred patient. We sought to compare the survival of injured patients after transfer to a trauma center with survival from a comparable time after injury among patients who had been admitted to the trauma center directly from the scene of injury.

METHODS

: Study included 2,867 patients 18 years to 84 years of age with at least one Abbreviated Injury Scale score >/=3 injury transferred to a trauma center and 7,570 patients admitted directly to a trauma center. The outcome was death within one year after injury. Cox proportional hazards model for death was used accounting for time since injury, adjusted for age group, gender, injury severity, injury mechanism, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

: Overall, there was almost no increase in the adjusted risk of death for transfer patients in the year after injury [hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78, 1.27]. The adjusted risk of death was higher in transfer patients than nontransfer patients between 50 days and 365 days after injury (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.79, 2.07), but not within the first 50 days (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.76, 1.18). However these modest differences in survival within each period were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

: After accounting for key demographic and clinical characteristics, transfer status does not appear to be a significant independent predictor of survival among patients with moderate to severe injuries treated at Level I trauma centers.

摘要

背景

创伤中心的医生在接手转诊患者的治疗时,需要了解患者的预后情况,以便做出恰当的临床决策。我们试图比较转诊至创伤中心的受伤患者的生存率与直接从受伤现场入院至创伤中心的患者在受伤后相当时间内的生存率。

方法

研究纳入了2867例年龄在18岁至84岁之间、至少有一项简略损伤量表评分≥3分损伤的转诊至创伤中心的患者,以及7570例直接入院至创伤中心的患者。结局指标为受伤后一年内死亡。采用Cox比例风险模型计算死亡风险,对受伤时间、年龄组、性别、损伤严重程度、损伤机制和合并症进行校正。

结果

总体而言,受伤后一年内转诊患者校正后的死亡风险几乎没有增加[风险比(HR)0.99,95%置信区间(CI)0.78,1.27]。受伤后50天至365天内,转诊患者校正后的死亡风险高于非转诊患者(HR 1.28,95%CI 0.79,2.07),但在最初50天内并非如此(HR 0.95,95%CI 0.76,1.18)。然而,各时间段内这些生存率的适度差异无统计学意义。

结论

在考虑关键人口统计学和临床特征后,转诊状态似乎并非一级创伤中心治疗的中重度损伤患者生存的重要独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of trauma patients after transfer to a level I trauma center.创伤患者转至一级创伤中心后的结局。
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1594-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493099.
2
Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment.一级创伤中心与二级创伤中心:基于结果的评估。
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1321-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181929e2b.
3
Survival benefit of transfer to tertiary trauma centers for major trauma patients initially presenting to nontertiary trauma centers.原发于非三甲创伤中心的严重创伤患者转送至三甲创伤中心的生存获益。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;17(11):1223-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00918.x.
4
Moving beyond personnel and process: a case for incorporating outcome measures in the trauma center designation process.超越人员与流程:在创伤中心指定过程中纳入结果指标的理由。
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):115-9; discussion 120. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.29.
5
Source of admission and outcomes for critically injured children in the mountain states.山区各州重症受伤儿童的入院来源及治疗结果。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Mar;164(3):277-82. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.285.
6
Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS): impact on on-scene times.直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS):对现场救援时间的影响
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):258-62. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000240449.23201.57.
7
Do pediatric patients with trauma in Florida have reduced mortality rates when treated in designated trauma centers?在佛罗里达州,遭受创伤的儿科患者在指定创伤中心接受治疗时死亡率会降低吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jan;43(1):212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.047.
8
Functional recovery at a minimum of 2 years after multiple injury-development of an outcome score.多发伤后至少2年的功能恢复——一种结局评分的制定
J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):799-808; discussion 808. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181820dae.
9
The benefit of higher level of care transfer of injured patients from nontertiary hospital emergency departments.将受伤患者从非三级医院急诊科进行更高水平护理转移的益处。
J Trauma. 2007 Nov;63(5):965-71. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c5665.
10
Quality of Care Within a Trauma Center Is not Altered by Injury Type.创伤中心的医疗质量不会因损伤类型而改变。
J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):716-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7bec0.

引用本文的文献

1
An Educational Video Game in Trauma Triage at Nontrauma Centers: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.非创伤中心创伤分诊教育视频游戏:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13375.
2
A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective.创伤系统的系统文献综述:运营管理视角
Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025 Jan 16;14:27536351241310645. doi: 10.1177/27536351241310645. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Discrimination and calibration of a prediction model for mortality is decreased in secondary transferred patients: a validation in the TraumaRegister DGU.
二次转移患者的死亡率预测模型的判别和校准能力降低:创伤登记处德国创伤学会的验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e056381. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056381.
4
Development of the Saudi Arabian trauma system.沙特阿拉伯创伤系统的发展。
J Med Life. 2022 Jan;15(1):34-42. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0066.
5
Respiratory and circulatory insufficiency during emergent long-distance critical care interhospital transports to tertiary care in a sparsely populated region: a retrospective analysis of late mortality risk.在人口稀少地区进行紧急长途重症监护院内转运至三级护理时的呼吸和循环功能不全:对晚期死亡率风险的回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e051217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051217.
6
Interfacility Transfers for Isolated Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: Perspectives of the Facial Trauma Surgeon.孤立性颅颌面创伤的机构间转运:面部创伤外科医生的观点
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021 Sep;14(3):201-208. doi: 10.1177/1943387520962276. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Impact of Inter-Hospital Transfer on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Tertiary Referral Center's Perspective.急诊腹部手术后患者院内转院对结局的影响:一家三级转诊中心的观点。
World J Surg. 2021 Sep;45(9):2703-2711. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06174-5. Epub 2021 May 31.
8
The Dubrava Model-A Novel Approach in Treating Acutely Neurotraumatized Patients in Rural Areas: A Proposal for Management.杜布拉瓦模型——农村地区急性神经创伤患者治疗的新方法:管理建议
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2019 Jul;10(3):446-451. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697777. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
9
Exclusive versus Inclusive Trauma System Model in High Volume Trauma Regions.高创伤发生率地区的排他性与包容性创伤系统模型
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018 Oct;6(4):269-270. doi: 10.29252/beat-060401.
10
Serious games may improve physician heuristics in trauma triage.严肃游戏可能改善创伤分诊中的医师启发式策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9204-9209. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805450115. Epub 2018 Aug 27.