Reder Anthony T, Velichko Sharlene, Yamaguchi Ken D, Hamamcioglu Kemal, Ku Karin, Beekman Johanna, Wagner T Charis, Perez H Daniel, Salamon Hugh, Croze Ed
Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60687, USA.
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2008 May;28(5):317-31. doi: 10.1089/jir.2007.0131.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Interferon-beta (IFN-beta) therapy for MS is hypothesized to cause short-term and long-term changes in gene expression that shift the inflammation from Th1 to Th2. In vivo gene induction to define kinetics of response to IFN-beta therapy in a large cohort of MS patients is described. Differential gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from relapsing-remitting MS patients (RRMS) was assessed using high content microarrays. Rapid onset of gene expression appeared within 4 h of subcutaneous IFN-beta administration, returning to baseline levels at 42 h in clinically stable RRMS. IFN-beta therapy in vivo rapidly but transiently induced strong upregulation of genes mediating immune modulation, IFN signaling, and antiviral responses. RT-PCR showed significant patient-to-patient variation in the magnitude of expression of multiple genes, especially for IFN-beta-inducible genes, such as MxA, IRF7, and CCL8, a Th1 product. Variation among patients in IFN-beta-induced RNA transcription was not explained by neutralizing antibodies or IFN receptor expression. Surprisingly, genes regulated in vivo by IFN-beta therapy do not support a simple Th1 to Th2 shift. A complex interplay between both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune regulatory genes is likely to act in concert in the treatment of RRMS.
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种中枢神经系统(CNS)的炎症性疾病。MS的干扰素-β(IFN-β)治疗被认为会导致基因表达的短期和长期变化,从而使炎症从Th1型转变为Th2型。本文描述了在一大群MS患者中进行体内基因诱导以确定对IFN-β治疗反应动力学的研究。使用高内涵微阵列评估复发缓解型MS患者(RRMS)外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)中的差异基因表达。皮下注射IFN-β后4小时内出现基因表达的快速启动,在临床稳定的RRMS患者中,42小时时基因表达恢复到基线水平。体内IFN-β治疗迅速但短暂地诱导了介导免疫调节、IFN信号传导和抗病毒反应的基因的强烈上调。逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)显示多个基因表达量在患者之间存在显著差异,尤其是对于IFN-β诱导基因,如Mx A、IRF7和Th1产物CCL8。IFN-β诱导的RNA转录在患者之间的差异不能用中和抗体或IFN受体表达来解释。令人惊讶的是,IFN-β治疗在体内调节的基因并不支持简单的从Th1型到Th2型的转变。促炎和抗炎免疫调节基因之间复杂的相互作用可能在RRMS的治疗中协同发挥作用。