Forshaw Peter J
University of London.
Early Sci Med. 2008;13(1):53-81. doi: 10.1163/157338207x242465.
Both Andreas Libavius and Heinrich Khunrath graduated from Basel Medical Academy in 1588, though the theses they defended reveal antithetical approaches to medicine, despite their shared interests in iatrochemistry and transmutational alchemy. Libavius argued in favour of Galenic allopathy while Khunrath promoted the contrasting homeopathic approach of Paracelsus and the utility of the occult doctrine of Signatures for medical purposes. This article considers these differences in the two graduates' theses, both as intimations of their subsequent divergent notions of the boundaries of alchemy and its relations with medicine and magic, and also as evidence of the surprisingly unstable academic status of Paracelsian philosophy in Basel, its main publishing centre, at the end of the sixteenth century.
安德烈亚斯·利巴维乌斯和海因里希·昆拉特都于1588年毕业于巴塞尔医学院,尽管他们所辩护的论文揭示了在医学上的对立方法,尽管他们在医化学和嬗变炼金术方面有着共同兴趣。利巴维乌斯主张盖伦派的对抗疗法,而昆拉特则推崇帕拉塞尔苏斯相反的顺势疗法以及医学目的的隐秘符号学说的效用。本文探讨了这两位毕业生论文中的这些差异,既将其视为他们随后对炼金术边界及其与医学和魔法关系的不同观念的暗示,也作为16世纪末在其主要出版中心巴塞尔,帕拉塞尔苏斯哲学令人惊讶的不稳定学术地位的证据。