McDonald Scott D, Beckham Jean C, Morey Rajendra, Marx Christine, Tupler Larry A, Calhoun Patrick S
VA Mid-Atlantic Region Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2008 Jun;21(3):309-17. doi: 10.1002/jts.20344.
Research generally supports a 4-factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. However, few studies have established factor invariance by comparing multiple groups. This study examined PTSD symptom structure using the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) across three veteran samples: treatment-seeking Vietnam-era veterans, treatment-seeking post-Vietnam-era veterans, and Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veteran research participants. Confirmatory factor analyses of DTS items demonstrated that a 4-factor structural model of the DTS (reexperiencing, avoidance, numbing, and hyperarousal) was superior to five alternate models, including the conventional 3-factor model proposed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Results supported factor invariance across the three veteran cohorts, suggesting that cross-group comparisons are interpretable. Implications and applications for DSM-IV nosology and the validity of symptom measures are discussed.
研究普遍支持创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的四因素结构。然而,很少有研究通过比较多个群体来确定因素不变性。本研究使用戴维森创伤量表(DTS)对三个退伍军人样本的PTSD症状结构进行了检验:寻求治疗的越战时期退伍军人、寻求治疗的越战后期退伍军人以及持久自由行动/伊拉克自由行动(OEF/OIF)退伍军人研究参与者。对DTS项目的验证性因素分析表明,DTS的四因素结构模型(重新体验、回避、麻木和过度警觉)优于五个替代模型,包括《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV;美国精神病学协会,1994)提出的传统三因素模型。结果支持了三个退伍军人队列中的因素不变性,这表明跨组比较是可解释的。讨论了对DSM-IV分类法的影响和应用以及症状测量的有效性。