• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持创伤后应激症状的新型五因素模型在三个独立的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人样本中的应用:一项验证性因素分析研究。

Support for a novel five-factor model of posttraumatic stress symptoms in three independent samples of Iraq/Afghanistan veterans: a confirmatory factor analytic study.

机构信息

National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Clinical Neurosciences Division, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.013
PMID:22154134
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A large body of confirmatory factor analytic studies of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms has demonstrated the superiority of 4-factor dysphoria and emotional numbing models over the DSM-IV model. Recently, a novel 5-factor model, which separates the DSM-IV hyperarousal symptom cluster into distinct dysphoric and anxious arousal clusters, has been identified. However, little research has evaluated the best-fitting representation of PTSD symptoms in veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the PTSD Checklist in three independent samples of Iraq/Afghanistan veterans, including two community samples and a treatment-seeking sample.

RESULTS

In all three samples, a novel model with five correlated factors reflecting symptoms of re-experiencing, avoidance, emotional numbing, dysphoric arousal, and anxious arousal provided a significantly better representation of PTSD symptoms than the DSM-IV, dysphoria, and numbing models. This model also showed evidence of "excellent fit" in the community samples according to empirically-defined benchmarks.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that PTSD symptomatology in both community and treatment-seeking Iraq/Afghanistan veterans may be best represented by a 5-factor model that separates the DSM-IV PTSD hyperarousal symptom cluster into distinct dysphoric arousal and anxious arousal clusters.

摘要

背景

大量创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的验证性因素分析研究表明,4 因素困扰和情绪麻木模型优于 DSM-IV 模型。最近,一种新的 5 因素模型将 DSM-IV 警觉症状群分为不同的困扰性和焦虑性警觉集群,已经被确定。然而,在伊拉克和阿富汗战争的退伍军人中,评估 PTSD 症状的最佳拟合表现的研究很少。

方法

使用验证性因素分析来检验 PTSD 检查表在三个独立的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人样本中的因素结构,包括两个社区样本和一个寻求治疗的样本。

结果

在所有三个样本中,一种具有五个相关因素的新模型,反映了再体验、回避、情绪麻木、困扰性警觉和焦虑性警觉的症状,比 DSM-IV、困扰和麻木模型更好地代表了 PTSD 症状。根据经验定义的基准,该模型在社区样本中也显示出“良好拟合”的证据。

结论

这些发现表明,在社区和寻求治疗的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人中,PTSD 症状学可能最好由一个 5 因素模型来表示,该模型将 DSM-IV PTSD 警觉症状群分为不同的困扰性警觉和焦虑性警觉集群。

相似文献

1
Support for a novel five-factor model of posttraumatic stress symptoms in three independent samples of Iraq/Afghanistan veterans: a confirmatory factor analytic study.支持创伤后应激症状的新型五因素模型在三个独立的伊拉克/阿富汗退伍军人样本中的应用:一项验证性因素分析研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):317-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
2
Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激症状的维度结构:对快感缺失与外化行为混合模型的支持
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
3
Numbing and dysphoria symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder among Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans: a review of findings and implications for treatment.创伤后应激障碍的麻木和苦恼症状在伊拉克和阿富汗战争老兵中的表现:研究结果综述及其对治疗的影响。
Behav Modif. 2012 Nov;36(6):834-56. doi: 10.1177/0145445512453735. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
4
Structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and psychosocial functioning in Veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.持久自由行动和伊拉克自由行动的退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状和社会心理功能的结构。
Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 May 23.
5
The symptom structure of posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Replication Survey.全国共病复制调查中创伤后应激障碍的症状结构
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 Dec;22(8):1523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
6
Factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in OEF/OIF veterans presenting to a polytrauma clinic.创伤后应激障碍症状在赴综合创伤诊所就诊的 OEF/OIF 老兵中的因子结构。
Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Nov;56(4):366-73. doi: 10.1037/a0025447. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
7
The dimensional structure of posttraumatic stress symptomatology in 323,903 U.S. veterans.323903 名美国退伍军人创伤后应激症状的维度结构。
J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Feb;49:31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis of posttraumatic stress symptoms in sexually harassed women.遭受性骚扰女性创伤后应激症状的验证性因素分析
J Trauma Stress. 2005 Dec;18(6):657-66. doi: 10.1002/jts.20074.
9
Assessing a five factor model of PTSD: is dysphoric arousal a unique PTSD construct showing differential relationships with anxiety and depression?评估创伤后应激障碍的五因素模型:激越性唤起是否是一种独特的创伤后应激障碍结构,与焦虑和抑郁有不同的关系?
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Mar;26(2):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
10
Assessing the fit of the Dysphoric Arousal model across two nationally representative epidemiological surveys: The Australian NSMHWB and the United States NESARC.评估两个具有全国代表性的流行病学调查(澳大利亚 NSMHWB 和美国 NESARC)中不愉悦唤起模型的拟合度。
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 Jan;27(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive review of rehabilitation approaches for traumatic brain injury: efficacy and outcomes.创伤性脑损伤康复方法的综合综述:疗效与结果
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 13;16:1608645. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1608645. eCollection 2025.
2
Level of perceived social support, and associated factors, in combat-exposed (ex-)military personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.战斗暴露(前)军人感知的社会支持水平及其相关因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;59(12):2119-2143. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02685-3. Epub 2024 May 21.
3
Family accommodation in PTSD: Proposed considerations and distinctions from the established transdiagnostic literature.
创伤后应激障碍中的家庭适应:建议的考量因素及与现有跨诊断文献的区别
Clin Psychol (New York). 2023 Dec;30(4):453-464. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12375. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
4
Cross-Species Convergence of Brain Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Findings in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review.创伤后应激障碍中脑转录组学和表观基因组学研究结果的跨物种趋同:一项系统综述
Complex Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 3;9(1-4):100-118. doi: 10.1159/000529536. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Associations between post-traumatic stress symptoms and quality of life among psychiatric healthcare personnel in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: A network approach.新冠疫情期间中国精神科医护人员创伤后应激症状与生活质量的关联:一种网络分析方法
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 15;14:975443. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.975443. eCollection 2023.
6
Factor structure of the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist (PCL-17) in 279,897 million veteran program participants.创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCL-17)在 279897 万退役军人计划参与者中的因子结构。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Jan;319:114994. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114994. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Reexperiencing and anxious arousal symptoms in relation to volumes of thalamus nuclei in posttraumatic stress spectrum adults.创伤后应激谱成年人的丘脑核体积与再体验和焦虑唤醒症状的关系。
Brain Behav. 2022 Jul;12(7):e2639. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2639. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
8
Deriving psychiatric symptom-based biomarkers from multivariate relationships between psychophysiological and biochemical measures.从心理生理和生化测量之间的多元关系中得出基于精神症状的生物标志物。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Dec;47(13):2252-2260. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01303-7. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
Altered gene expression and PTSD symptom dimensions in World Trade Center responders.世贸中心救援人员基因表达改变与 PTSD 症状维度
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;27(4):2225-2246. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01457-2. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Epigenome-wide association study of posttraumatic stress disorder identifies novel loci in U.S. military veterans.创伤后应激障碍的全基因组关联研究在美国退伍军人中确定了新的位点。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 17;12(1):65. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01822-3.