Suppr超能文献

皮质类固醇在急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理中的作用。

Role of corticosteroids in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Deal Eli N, Hollands James M, Schramm Garrett E, Micek Scott T

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):787-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.012.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence exploring the use of corticosteroids for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has targeted various stages of disease progression, from preventing ARDS in high-risk patients to halting disease evolution once ARDS has developed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to evaluate randomized, controlled trials describing the role of corticosteroids in preventing and treating ARDS.

METHODS

English-language randomized, controlled trials were identified using MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE searches (key terms: acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute lung injury, and corticosteroids; years: 1968-January 2008).

RESULTS

A total of 10 trials were found and included in this analysis. Trials describing the role of high-dose corticosteroids compared with controls in preventing ARDS found no benefit, with the range of occurrence of ARDS in at-risk populations from 14% to 64% and absolute increases in mortality from 4% to 31%. Conflicting evidence was found for treating late-phase ARDS with corticosteroids, with 13% hospital mortality among patients receiving corticosteroids versus 63% with controls (P = 0.03) in one small study, but no significant difference was found when evaluating 60-day mortality (corticosteroid group, 29.2% vs control, 28.6%) in another investigation. The use of high-dose corticosteroids for the treatment of early phase ARDS was not associated with significant differences in 45-day mortality (methylprednisolone, 60% vs control, 63%). However, one trial found that methylprednisolone taper for early ARDS was associated with significant improvement in lung function or extubation (69.8% vs 35.7%; P = 0.002), fewer days on mechanical ventilation (median, 5.0 vs 9.5; P = 0.002), higher intensive care unit survival (79.4% vs 57.4%; P = 0.03), but similar rates of hospital survival (methylprednisolone, 76.2% vs control, 57.1%; P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from clinical trials did not support the use of short-course, high-dose corticosteroids for preventing ARDS or for the treatment of early ARDS. Longer-course corticosteroids have not conclusively been associated with improved survival in the treatment of late-phase ARDS but have provided some benefits in other markers of disease severity in this setting and in early phase ARDS. Published trials support the administration of low- to moderate-dose corticosteroids in the treatment of early (<7 days) and late-phase (days 7\2-14) ARDS, but this evidence is controversial.

摘要

背景

探索使用皮质类固醇治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的证据针对疾病进展的各个阶段,从预防高危患者发生ARDS到在ARDS发生后阻止疾病进展。

目的

本综述的目的是评估描述皮质类固醇在预防和治疗ARDS中作用的随机对照试验。

方法

通过PubMed和EMBASE检索MEDLINE来识别英文随机对照试验(关键词:急性呼吸窘迫综合征、急性肺损伤和皮质类固醇;年份:1968年 - 2008年1月)。

结果

共找到10项试验并纳入本分析。描述高剂量皮质类固醇与对照组相比在预防ARDS中的作用的试验未发现有益效果,高危人群中ARDS的发生率在14%至64%之间,死亡率的绝对增加在4%至31%之间。对于使用皮质类固醇治疗晚期ARDS存在相互矛盾的证据,在一项小型研究中,接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者医院死亡率为13%,而对照组为63%(P = 0.03),但在另一项调查中评估60天死亡率时未发现显著差异(皮质类固醇组为29.2%,对照组为28.6%)。使用高剂量皮质类固醇治疗早期ARDS在45天死亡率方面未发现显著差异(甲基强的松龙组为60%,对照组为63%)。然而,一项试验发现,早期ARDS使用甲基强的松龙逐渐减量与肺功能改善或拔管显著相关(69.8%对35.7%;P = 0.002),机械通气天数减少(中位数分别为5.0天和9.5天;P = 0.002)重症监护病房生存率更高(79.4%对57.4%;P = 0.03),但医院生存率相似(甲基强的松龙组为76.2%,对照组为57.1%;P =无统计学意义)。

结论

临床试验数据不支持使用短疗程、高剂量皮质类固醇预防ARDS或治疗早期ARDS。较长疗程的皮质类固醇在治疗晚期ARDS中尚未确凿地显示与生存率改善相关,但在这种情况下以及早期ARDS的其他疾病严重程度指标方面提供了一些益处。已发表的试验支持在治疗早期(<7天)和晚期(7 - 14天)ARDS时给予低至中等剂量的皮质类固醇,但这一证据存在争议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验