Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César, Alonso-Blanco Cristina, Cleland Joshua A, Rodríguez-Blanco Cleofás, Alburquerque-Sendín Francisco
Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jun;31(5):332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.006.
This study examines if C7-T1 manipulation results in changes in pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over bilateral C5-C6 zygapophyseal joints in asymptomatic subjects.
Thirty subjects, 13 men and 17 women, without a current history of neck, shoulder, or upper extremity pain participated. Participants were randomly divided into 3 groups: experimental dominant group, subjects who received the manipulative thrust directed at the right side of the C7-T1 joint; experimental nondominant group, those who received the thrust on the left side of the C7-T1 joint; and a placebo group, those who received a sham-manual procedure. The outcome measure was the PPT on both right and left C5-C5 zygapophyseal joints, which was assessed at preintervention and 5 minutes postintervention by an assessor blinded to the treatment allocation of the subject. A 3-way repeated measures analysis of covariance was used to evaluate changes in PPT.
The analysis of covariance revealed time x group (F = 32.3; P < .001), time x side (F = 4.9; P < .05), time x sex (F = 7.93; P < .01), and time x group x sex (F = 7.606; P < .001) interactions. Post hoc analyses found that (a) both experimental groups showed greater improvements in PPT than the placebo group (P < .05), without significant differences between them (P > .6); (b) the right side had greater increases in PPT in both experimental groups (P < .05), but not within the placebo group (P > .8); (c) men experienced greater increases in PPT levels than women, particularly in the experimental nondominant group (P < .01). Within-group effect sizes were large for both experimental groups (d > 1), but small for the placebo condition (d < 0.2).
These results suggest that a C7-T1 manipulation induced changes in PPT in both right and left C5-C6 zygapophyseal joints in healthy subjects.
本研究旨在探讨对无症状受试者进行C7-T1节段手法操作是否会导致双侧C5-C6关节突关节的压痛阈值(PPT)发生变化。
30名受试者参与研究,其中男性13名,女性17名,均无颈部、肩部或上肢疼痛病史。参与者被随机分为3组:实验优势侧组,即接受针对C7-T1关节右侧的手法推压的受试者;实验非优势侧组,即接受针对C7-T1关节左侧的手法推压的受试者;以及安慰剂组,即接受假手法操作的受试者。观察指标为双侧C5-C6关节突关节的PPT,由对受试者治疗分配不知情的评估者在干预前和干预后5分钟进行评估。采用三因素重复测量协方差分析来评估PPT的变化。
协方差分析显示存在时间×组间(F = 32.3;P <.001)、时间×侧别(F = 4.9;P <.05)、时间×性别(F = 7.93;P <.01)以及时间×组间×性别(F = 7.606;P <.001)的交互作用。事后分析发现:(a)两个实验组的PPT改善程度均大于安慰剂组(P <.05),但两组之间无显著差异(P >.6);(b)两个实验组中右侧的PPT升高幅度更大(P <.05),但安慰剂组内无此差异(P >.8);(c)男性的PPT升高幅度大于女性,尤其是在实验非优势侧组(P <.01)。两个实验组的组内效应量均较大(d > 1),而安慰剂组的效应量较小(d < 0.2)。
这些结果表明,对健康受试者进行C7-T1节段手法操作会引起双侧C5-C6关节突关节的PPT发生变化。