Vasselai Priscila, Kamimura Maria Ayako, Bazanelli Ana Paula, Pupim Lara Bezas, Avesani Carla Maria, da Mota Ribeiro Fabiana Sanches, Manfredi Silvia Regina, Draibe Sérgio Antônio, Cuppari Lilian
Nutrition Program, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Ren Nutr. 2008 Jul;18(4):363-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2007.12.005.
Changes in body fat (BF) were shown to occur over time in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, the factors associated with BF changes have not been fully investigated in this population.
We studied 45 patients (25 were male; age, 53, SD +/- 15 years; 21 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis/24 automated peritoneal dialysis; PD vintage, 14 ([range, 3 to 104] months; 40% were diabetic; 31% were previously treated by hemodialysis). Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectric impedance analysis, nutritional status was assessed by subjective global assessment, energy intake was assessed by 3-day food records, and resting energy expenditure (REE) was assessed by indirect calorimetry. Glucose absorption, serum bicarbonate, and C-reactive protein were also evaluated. All measurements were performed at baseline and after 12 months.
Large variability in BF changes was observed among patients: 53% gained BF (+3.0 +/- 2.8), whereas 47% lost BF (-2.3, SD +/- 1.4). At baseline, groups were similar regarding sex, age, percent diabetics, DP modality, characteristics of peritoneal transport, residual renal function, energy intake, glucose absorption, and REE. However, patients who gained BF had lower BF (16.3, SD +/- 6.9 kg, versus 20.9, SD +/- 6.5 kg; P = .03), had a higher ratio of total energy offered (intake plus absorbed glucose) to REE (1.45, SD +/- 0.39, versus 1.26, SD +/- 0.24; P = .04), and were on PD for a shorter time (10 [range, 3 to 104] versus 20 [range, 4 to 76] months; P = .03). This group also had a higher proportion of malnourished patients (50% versus 19%; P = .03) and of patients previously treated by hemodialysis (46% versus 14%; P = .03). After 12 months, a reduction in the frequency of malnutrition (50% to 25%; P = .02) was observed in the group of patients with increased BF. Patients who lost BF reduced their body cell mass (from 21.7 [SD +/- 5.1 kg] to 20.7 [SD +/- 5.0 kg]; P < .01) and level of serum bicarbonate (from 22.7 [SD +/- 3.7 mmol/L] to 20.9 [SD +/- 3.1 mmol/L]; P < .01). Moreover, this group had an increase in frequency of malnutrition (from 19% to 38%; P = .02), a reduction in the proportion of patients with residual renal function (from 62% to 43%; P = .03), and a higher number of hospitalizations (from 25% to 4%; P = .02) during follow-up. Glucose absorption and C-reactive protein were not associated with BF changes. A regression analysis showed that baseline body mass index was independently associated with a gain of BF (-0.19, SE = 0.09, P = .04), and that hospitalization during follow-up was associated with a loss of BF (2.35, SE = 1.19, P = .04).
Prevalent PD patients exhibited a large variability in BF changes. Baseline body mass index and hospitalizations during follow-up were the most important factors associated with these changes.
腹膜透析(PD)患者的体脂(BF)随时间发生变化。然而,该人群中与BF变化相关的因素尚未得到充分研究。
我们研究了45例患者(25例男性;年龄53岁,标准差±15岁;21例持续非卧床腹膜透析/24例自动化腹膜透析;腹膜透析时间14(范围3至104)个月;40%为糖尿病患者;31%曾接受血液透析治疗)。通过双能X线吸收法和生物电阻抗分析评估身体成分,通过主观全面评定法评估营养状况,通过3天饮食记录评估能量摄入,通过间接测热法评估静息能量消耗(REE)。还评估了葡萄糖吸收、血清碳酸氢盐和C反应蛋白。所有测量均在基线和12个月后进行。
观察到患者之间BF变化存在很大差异:53%的患者BF增加(+3.0±2.8),而47%的患者BF减少(-2.3,标准差±1.4)。在基线时,两组在性别、年龄、糖尿病患者百分比、腹膜透析方式、腹膜转运特征、残余肾功能、能量摄入、葡萄糖吸收和REE方面相似。然而,BF增加的患者BF较低(16.3,标准差±6.9kg,对比20.9,标准差±6.5kg;P = 0.03),总能量供应(摄入加吸收的葡萄糖)与REE的比值较高(1.45,标准差±0.39,对比1.26,标准差±0.24;P = 0.04),且接受腹膜透析的时间较短(10(范围3至104)对比20(范围4至76)个月;P = 0.03)。该组营养不良患者的比例也较高(50%对比19%;P = 0.03),且曾接受血液透析治疗的患者比例较高(46%对比14%;P = 0.03)。12个月后,BF增加的患者组中营养不良的频率降低(50%至25%;P = 0.02)。BF减少的患者身体细胞质量降低(从21.7(标准差±5.1kg)降至20.7(标准差±5.0kg);P < 0.01),血清碳酸氢盐水平降低(从22.7(标准差±3.7mmol/L)降至20.9(标准差±3.1mmol/L);P < 0.01)。此外,该组在随访期间营养不良的频率增加(从19%至38%;P = 0.02),残余肾功能患者的比例降低(从62%至43%;P = 0.03),住院次数增加(从25%至4%;P = 0.02)。葡萄糖吸收和C反应蛋白与BF变化无关。回归分析表明,基线体重指数与BF增加独立相关(-0.19,标准误 = 0.09,P = 0.04),随访期间住院与BF减少相关(2.35,标准误 = 1.19,P = 0.04)。
腹膜透析患者的BF变化存在很大差异。基线体重指数和随访期间的住院是与这些变化相关的最重要因素。