Suppr超能文献

华盛顿大学头颈部合并症指数在老年患者队列中的验证

Validation of the Washington University Head and Neck Comorbidity Index in a cohort of older patients.

作者信息

Sanabria Alvaro, Carvalho André Lopes, Vartanian José Guilherme, Magrin José, Ikeda Mauro Kasuo, Kowalski Luiz Paulo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Fundación Abood Shaio, Campus Puente del Comun, Km 21 Autopista Norte, Bogotá Colombia.

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jun;134(6):603-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.6.603.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate the prognostic ability of the Washington University Head and Neck Comorbidity Index (WUHNCI) relative to 5-year survival in a cohort of older patients with head and neck cancer and to compare it with that of the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27).

DESIGN

Validation study.

SETTING

Academic research.

PATIENTS

Three hundred twenty-one patients older than 70 years with head and neck cancer in a tertiary cancer center. Comorbidity was measured using the ACE-27, WUHNCI, and National Cancer Institute (NCI) comorbidity index.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Five-year overall survival.

RESULTS

Five-year overall and cancer-specific survival, respectively, were as follows: Using the WUHNCI, 52.2% and 62.9% for a score of 0; 25.1% and 41.7% for a score of 1; 39.3% and 64.9% for a score of 2; and 19.5% and 45.0% for a score of 3 or higher. Using the ACE-27, 54.4% and 61.7% for a score of 0 (no comorbidity); 46.8% and 61.7% for a score of 1 (mild comorbidity); 31.7% and 51.6% for a score of 2 (moderate comorbidity); and 13.8% and 43.7% for a score of 3 (severe comorbidity). The C statistics were 0.641 for the NCI comorbidity index, 0.656 for the ACE-27, and 0.686 for the WUHNCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The WUHNCI did not demonstrate good discriminative power compared with the ACE-27 in a cohort of older patients. To be widely used, instruments developed to measure comorbidities must be reliable in any population. We believe that the ACE-27 is still the best index to assess comorbidities and that it should be used in studies evaluating the prognostic effect of comorbidities.

摘要

目的

在一组老年头颈癌患者中验证华盛顿大学头颈合并症指数(WUHNCI)相对于5年生存率的预后能力,并将其与成人合并症评估27(ACE - 27)进行比较。

设计

验证性研究。

设置

学术研究。

患者

一家三级癌症中心的321名年龄大于70岁的头颈癌患者。使用ACE - 27、WUHNCI和美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)合并症指数测量合并症。

主要观察指标

5年总生存率。

结果

5年总生存率和癌症特异性生存率分别如下:使用WUHNCI,评分为0时分别为52.2%和62.9%;评分为1时分别为25.1%和41.7%;评分为2时分别为39.3%和64.9%;评分为3或更高时分别为19.5%和45.0%。使用ACE - 27,评分为0(无合并症)时分别为54.4%和61.7%;评分为1(轻度合并症)时分别为46.8%和61.7%;评分为2(中度合并症)时分别为31.7%和51.6%;评分为3(重度合并症)时分别为13.8%和43.7%。NCI合并症指数的C统计量为0.641,ACE - 27为0.656,WUHNCI为0.686。

结论

在老年患者队列中,与ACE - 27相比,WUHNCI未显示出良好的鉴别能力。为了广泛应用,用于测量合并症的工具必须在任何人群中都可靠。我们认为ACE - 27仍然是评估合并症的最佳指数,并且应该用于评估合并症预后效果的研究中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验