• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对多发性硬化症相关护理的认知:按初级保健医生的执业专业进行比较

Patient perceptions of multiple sclerosis-related care: comparisons by practice specialty of principal care physician.

作者信息

Buchanan Robert J, Kaufman Michael, Zhu Li, James Wesley

机构信息

Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.

出版信息

NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(3):267-72.

PMID:18560144
Abstract

Do people with multiple sclerosis who receive the majority of their care from neurologists perceive access to and quality of their care differently than people receiving their care from medical internists, family/general practitioners, and other types of physicians? The objective of this study is to identify any patient-identified differences in MS-related care by the practice specialty of the principal care physician, as well as differences by practice specialty in satisfaction with access to physician services and differences in patient perceptions of quality. Data were collected by surveying 1,518 people with MS throughout the United States and grouped by practice specialty of principal care physician (neurologist, internal medicine, family/general practice, and other physicians). Significant differences were observed by practice specialty of the principal care physician in physician understanding of various aspects of MS, satisfaction with access to MS-focused care, and quality of MS-focused care, with neurologists associated with better patient perceptions. Patients consider MS-related care superior when it is delivered by neurologists compared to MS patients receiving care from medical internists, family/general practitioners, and other physicians.

摘要

与从内科实习医生、家庭/全科医生及其他类型医生处接受治疗的多发性硬化症患者相比,主要从神经科医生处接受大部分治疗的多发性硬化症患者对医疗服务的可及性和质量的认知是否有所不同?本研究的目的是确定患者所指出的、由主要护理医生的执业专科所导致的与多发性硬化症相关护理方面的差异,以及因执业专科不同而在对医生服务可及性的满意度方面的差异和患者对质量的认知差异。通过对美国各地1518名多发性硬化症患者进行调查来收集数据,并按主要护理医生的执业专科(神经科医生、内科、家庭/全科及其他医生)进行分组。主要护理医生的执业专科在医生对多发性硬化症各方面的理解、对专注于多发性硬化症护理的可及性的满意度以及专注于多发性硬化症护理的质量方面存在显著差异,神经科医生与更好的患者认知相关。与从内科实习医生、家庭/全科医生及其他医生处接受治疗的多发性硬化症患者相比,患者认为由神经科医生提供的与多发性硬化症相关的护理更优质。

相似文献

1
Patient perceptions of multiple sclerosis-related care: comparisons by practice specialty of principal care physician.患者对多发性硬化症相关护理的认知:按初级保健医生的执业专业进行比较
NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(3):267-72.
2
Urban/rural differences in the use of physician services by people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者在使用医生服务方面的城乡差异。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2006;21(3):177-87.
3
Patient satisfaction with family physicians and general internists: is there a difference?患者对家庭医生和普通内科医生的满意度:有差异吗?
J Fam Pract. 1988 May;26(5):543-51.
4
Rural-urban analyses of health-related quality of life among people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者健康相关生活质量的城乡分析。
J Rural Health. 2008 Summer;24(3):244-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00165.x.
5
Assessment of medical care by elderly people: general satisfaction and physician quality.老年人对医疗护理的评估:总体满意度与医生质量
Health Serv Res. 1998 Feb;32(6):741-58.
6
Utilization of health care by patients with multiple sclerosis is based on professional and patient-defined health needs.患有多发性硬化症的患者对医疗保健的利用基于专业人员和患者确定的健康需求。
Mult Scler. 2008 Nov;14(9):1269-79. doi: 10.1177/1352458508094884. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
7
Primary care practice coordination versus physician continuity.初级保健实践协调与医生连续性
Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):15-21.
8
Palliative care in patients with severe multiple sclerosis: two case reports and a survey among German MS neurologists.重症多发性硬化症患者的姑息治疗:两例病例报告及对德国多发性硬化症神经科医生的一项调查
Palliat Med. 2007 Mar;21(2):109-14. doi: 10.1177/0269216306075112.
9
Urban/rural differences in access and barriers to health care for people with multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症患者获得医疗保健的机会及障碍方面的城乡差异。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2006 Winter;29(3):360-75.
10
Personalised care, access, quality and team coordination are the main dimensions of family medicine output.个性化医疗、可及性、质量和团队协作是家庭医学产出的主要维度。
Fam Pract. 2007 Feb;24(1):41-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml056. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurophobia: why, how much, consequences and solutions.神经恐惧症:成因、程度、后果及解决办法
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Jan 7;9:3. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000003.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Is it worth it?: The experiences of persons with multiple sclerosis as they access health care to manage their condition.是否值得?:多发性硬化症患者在获得医疗保健以管理其病情时的体验。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1269-1279. doi: 10.1111/hex.13109. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Projecting the Adequacy of the Multiple Sclerosis Neurologist Workforce.预测多发性硬化症神经科医生劳动力的充足程度。
Int J MS Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;20(1):35-43. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-044.
4
Perceptions of Multiple Sclerosis in Hispanic Americans: Need for Targeted Messaging.西班牙裔美国人对多发性硬化症的认知:针对性信息传递的必要性。
Int J MS Care. 2017 May-Jun;19(3):131-139. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2015-081.
5
Factors Associated with Neurologists' Provision of MS Patient Care.与神经科医生提供多发性硬化症患者护理相关的因素。
Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:624790. doi: 10.1155/2014/624790. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
Interest in providing multiple sclerosis care and subspecializing in multiple sclerosis among neurology residents.神经病学住院医师对提供多发性硬化症护理及成为多发性硬化症专科医生的兴趣。
Int J MS Care. 2014 Spring;16(1):26-38. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2013-009.