Ovsag Kimberly, Hydery Sabrina, Mousa Shaker A
Pharmaceutical Research Institute at Albany College of Pharmacy, Albany, New York 12208, USA.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(2):403-13. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s926.
To analyze the implementation of Medicaid preferred drug lists (PDLs) in a number of states and determine its impact on quality of care and cost relative to other segments of healthcare.
We reviewed research and case studies found by searching library databases, primarily MEDLINE and EBSCOHost, and searching pertinent journals. Keywords initially included "drug lists," "prior authorization," "prior approval," and "Medicaid." We added terms such as "influence use of other healthcare services," "quality of care," and "overall economic impact." We mainly used primary sources.
Based on our literature review, we determined that there are a number of issues regarding Medicaid PDLs that need to be addressed. Some issues include: (a) the potential for PDLs to influence the utilization of other healthcare services, (b) criteria used by Medicaid for determining acceptance of drugs onto a PDL, (c) the effect of PDL implementation on compliance to new regimens, (d) the potential effects of restricting medication availability on quality of care, (e) administrative costs associated with PDLs, and (f) satisfaction rates among patients and medical providers. This review highlighted expected short-term cost savings with limited degree of compromised quality of PDL implementation, but raised the concern about the potential long-term decline in quality of care and overall economic impact.
The number of concerns raised indicates that further studies are warranted regarding both short-term cost benefits as well as potential long-term effects of Medicaid PDL implementation. Objective analysis of these effects is necessary to ensure cost-effectiveness and quality of care.
分析多个州医疗补助优选药物清单(PDL)的实施情况,并确定其相对于医疗保健其他领域在医疗质量和成本方面的影响。
我们查阅了通过搜索图书馆数据库(主要是MEDLINE和EBSCOHost)以及相关期刊找到的研究和案例研究。最初的关键词包括“药物清单”“预先授权”“预先批准”和“医疗补助”。我们添加了诸如“影响其他医疗服务的使用”“医疗质量”和“总体经济影响”等术语。我们主要使用一手资料。
基于我们的文献综述,我们确定医疗补助PDL存在一些需要解决的问题。一些问题包括:(a)PDL影响其他医疗服务利用的可能性;(b)医疗补助用于确定药物是否被纳入PDL的标准;(c)PDL实施对新治疗方案依从性的影响;(d)限制药物可及性对医疗质量的潜在影响;(e)与PDL相关的行政成本;(f)患者和医疗服务提供者的满意度。这项综述强调了在PDL实施质量受损程度有限的情况下预期的短期成本节约,但引发了对医疗质量潜在长期下降和总体经济影响的担忧。
提出的问题数量表明,有必要对医疗补助PDL实施的短期成本效益以及潜在的长期影响进行进一步研究。对这些影响进行客观分析对于确保成本效益和医疗质量是必要的。