Suppr超能文献

大学生性行为冒险的测量。

Measurement of sexual risk taking among college students.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio University, 200 Porter Hall, Athens, OH 45701, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Dec;38(6):936-48. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9388-z. Epub 2008 Jun 19.

Abstract

Current measures of sexual risk taking are either too narrowly focused to be used with college students or do not have adequate psychometric properties. The goal of the current study was to develop a broad and psychometrically sound measure of sexual risk taking. A total of 613 undergraduate students (302 men, 311 women) at a mid-sized Midwestern university in the U.S. were surveyed to develop and gather reliability and validity information on a new measure of sexual risk, the Sexual Risk Survey (SRS). The measure was found to be multifactorial with five factors. The measure was found to have good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The SRS also demonstrated evidence of convergent and concurrent validity by its relationships with reported number of sexual partners and history of infidelity as well as measures of sensation seeking, sexual desire, substance use, sexual excitation and inhibition, and sexual health consequences. Social desirability was not found to be related to sexual risk taking scores and threat of sexual disclosure was only weakly related. An investigation of sex differences revealed that men reported greater intentions to engage in sexual risk behaviors and greater overall sexual risk taking behavior compared to women. The SRS provides researchers with a valid and comprehensive measure of sexual risk taking that can be used to clarify inconsistent findings in the literature and to assess outcome in programs designed to prevent and reduce sexual risk behaviors among college students.

摘要

目前的性行为风险评估方法要么过于狭隘,无法用于大学生群体,要么缺乏充分的心理测量学特性。本研究旨在开发一种广泛且具有良好心理测量学特性的性行为风险评估方法。我们对美国中西部一所中等规模大学的 613 名本科生(302 名男性,311 名女性)进行了调查,以开发和收集性行为风险调查(SRS)这一新评估方法的可靠性和有效性信息。研究发现该评估方法具有多因素特性,包含五个因素。该评估方法具有良好的内部一致性和重测信度。SRS 与报告的性伴侣数量和不忠史以及感觉寻求、性欲望、物质使用、性兴奋和抑制以及性健康后果等措施之间的关系,也证明了其具有收敛和同时效度。社会期望度与性行为风险评分无关,性披露的威胁也只有微弱的相关性。对性别差异的研究发现,与女性相比,男性报告称更倾向于参与性行为风险行为,且整体性行为风险更高。SRS 为研究人员提供了一种有效的、全面的性行为风险评估方法,可以用于澄清文献中不一致的发现,并评估旨在预防和减少大学生性行为风险行为的项目的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验