Lee Min K, Choi Byung Y, Yang Gwi Y, Jeon Hye J, Kyung Hee M, Kwon Oh W, Park Hyo S, Bae Yong C, Mokha Sukhbir S, Ahn Dong K
Department of Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, 188-1 Sam Deok 2 ga, Chung-gu, Daegu 700-412, Republic of Korea Institution of BrainKorea21, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea Department of Neurobiology and Neurotoxicology, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Boulevard, Nashville, TN 37208, USA.
Pain. 2008 Oct 15;139(2):367-375. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
This study provides the first demonstration that central cannabinoids modulate the antinociceptive actions of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) on formalin-induced temporomandibular joint (TMJ) nociception. Noxious scratching behavior induced by formalin injection in the TMJ was used as a model of pain. Intracisternal injection of 30mug of WIN 55,212-2, a non-subtype selective cannabinoid receptor agonist, attenuated the number of scratches by 75% as compared with the vehicle-treated group, whereas vehicle alone or 3 or 10 microg of WIN 55,212-2 had no effect. To explore the postulated interaction between central cannabinoid receptors and mGluRs, effects of combined administration of sub-analgesic doses of WIN 55,212-2 and group II or III mGluR agonists were tested. Group II or III mGluRs agonists were administered intracisternally 10 min after intracisternal administration of WIN 55,212-2. Neither 100 nmol APDC, a group II mGluRs agonist, nor L-AP4, a group III mGluR agonist, altered nociceptive behavior when given alone but significantly inhibited the formalin-induced nociceptive behavior in the presence of a sub-threshold dose ( 3microg) of WIN 55,212-2. The ED50 value of APDC or L-AP4 was significantly reduced upon co-treatment with WIN 55,212-2 than in the vehicle-treated group, highlighting the important therapeutic potential of the combined administration of group II or III mGluR agonists with cannabinoids to effectively treat inflammatory pain associated with the TMJ. Potentiating effects of group II or III mGluRs agonists will likely permit the administration of cannabinoids at doses that do not achieve significant accumulation to produce undesirable motor dysfunction.
本研究首次证明,中枢大麻素可调节代谢型谷氨酸受体(mGluRs)对福尔马林诱导的颞下颌关节(TMJ)伤害感受的镇痛作用。将福尔马林注射到TMJ中诱导的有害抓挠行为用作疼痛模型。脑池内注射30μg WIN 55,212-2(一种非亚型选择性大麻素受体激动剂),与溶剂处理组相比,抓挠次数减少了75%,而单独使用溶剂或3μg或10μg WIN 55,212-2则没有效果。为了探究中枢大麻素受体与mGluRs之间假定的相互作用,测试了亚镇痛剂量的WIN 55,212-2与II组或III组mGluR激动剂联合给药的效果。在脑池内注射WIN 55,212-2后10分钟,脑池内注射II组或III组mGluR激动剂。II组mGluR激动剂APDC 100 nmol和III组mGluR激动剂L-AP4单独给药时均未改变伤害感受行为,但在亚阈值剂量(3μg)的WIN 55,212-2存在时,可显著抑制福尔马林诱导的伤害感受行为。与溶剂处理组相比,APDC或L-AP4与WIN 55,212-2联合治疗时的ED50值显著降低,突出了II组或III组mGluR激动剂与大麻素联合给药有效治疗TMJ相关炎性疼痛的重要治疗潜力。II组或III组mGluR激动剂的增强作用可能会允许以不会导致显著蓄积而产生不良运动功能障碍的剂量使用大麻素。