Chen Ping-Tsung, Liaw Chuang-Chi
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Chang Gung Med J. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):167-74.
This study examined whether different ondansetron dosing schedules plus dexamethasone influenced antiemetic efficacy during multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT). Antiemetic activities between previous CT and subsequent cycles were compared.
The cross-over study involved 424 patients. Arm A, three doses of 8 mg ondansetron given intravenously (IV) at 4-hourly intervals plus dexamethasone 20 mg IV at the start of CT, followed by dexamethasone 5 mg IV every 12 hours. Arm B, as arm A but the three doses of 8 mg ondansetron were given at 24-hourly intervals. For those with complete protection from emesis in both arms, a single dose of 8 mg ondansetron (arm C) was tried during the following CT. Once complete protection of emesis could not be maintained, arm A regimens were administered in the subsequent cycles of CT.
There were 384, 377 and 147 patients in arm A, arm B and arm C, respectively. Complete control of acute and delayed nausea/vomiting obtained in arm A were 91.4%/94.8% and 59.6%/70.1%, and in arm B were 90.4%/92.3% and 61.3% 72.7%. There was no significant difference in antiemetic efficacy between both arms. Decreased incidence of and delayed onset of nausea on day 2 were observed in arm B (p = 0.002). The emetic severity during previous CT correlated significantly with those of the subsequent CT. The complete control of nausea/vomiting was maintained in 81.6%/72.1% of arm C patients during the following 3rd-6th cycles of CT.
No difference in antiemetic efficacy was shown when a triple 8 mg dose of ondansetron was given at 4-hourly intervals or at 24-hourly intervals. However, the latter improved nausea on day 2. A single 8 mg dose of ondansetron can maintain antiemetic efficacy in the majority of complete responders in arm A and arm B.
本研究探讨了不同的昂丹司琼给药方案联合地塞米松在多周期顺铂化疗(CT)过程中对止吐疗效的影响。比较了前次CT与后续周期之间的止吐活性。
这项交叉研究纳入了424例患者。A组,在CT开始时静脉注射(IV)3剂8mg昂丹司琼,每4小时1次,加20mg地塞米松IV,随后每12小时静脉注射5mg地塞米松。B组,与A组相同,但3剂8mg昂丹司琼每24小时给药1次。对于在两组中均完全预防呕吐的患者,在随后的CT期间尝试单剂量8mg昂丹司琼(C组)。一旦无法维持对呕吐的完全预防,则在后续的CT周期中给予A组方案。
A组、B组和C组分别有384例、377例和147例患者。A组急性和延迟性恶心/呕吐的完全控制率分别为91.4%/94.8%和59.6%/70.1%,B组为90.4%/92.3%和61.3%/72.7%。两组的止吐疗效无显著差异。B组在第2天观察到恶心发生率降低和延迟发作(p = 0.002)。前次CT期间的呕吐严重程度与后续CT的严重程度显著相关。在随后的第3 - 6周期CT中,C组患者中81.6%/72.1%维持了恶心/呕吐的完全控制。
每4小时或每24小时给予3剂8mg昂丹司琼时,止吐疗效无差异。然而,后者改善了第2天的恶心症状。单剂量8mg昂丹司琼可在A组和B组的大多数完全缓解者中维持止吐疗效。