• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧美:对比与趋同

Europe and the United States: contrast and convergence.

作者信息

Callahan Daniel

机构信息

International Program, The Hastings Center, 21 Malcolm Gordon Road, Garrison, NY 10510, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2008 Jun;33(3):280-93. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn009.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhn009
PMID:18567907
Abstract

Though the health care systems of the United States and the European countries are very different, they are being buffeted by similar problems: rising health care costs caused by aging populations, technology, and rising public demand and expectations. The primary difference is that the US system is heavily privatized, whereas the European systems are heavily government run or operated. But the latter systems are increasingly open to market ideas and practices while the US is steadily being pushed toward a stronger government role. This article offers some speculation about their gradual convergence in the years ahead.

摘要

尽管美国和欧洲国家的医疗保健系统差异很大,但它们都面临着类似的问题:人口老龄化、技术以及公众需求和期望上升导致医疗保健成本不断上涨。主要区别在于,美国的医疗保健系统高度私有化,而欧洲的医疗保健系统则主要由政府运营。但欧洲的医疗保健系统越来越接受市场理念和做法,而美国则正稳步朝着政府发挥更强作用的方向发展。本文对它们在未来几年的逐渐趋同进行了一些推测。

相似文献

1
Europe and the United States: contrast and convergence.欧美:对比与趋同
J Med Philos. 2008 Jun;33(3):280-93. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn009.
2
Individual responsibility and solidarity in European health care: further down the road to two-tier system of health care.欧洲医疗保健中的个人责任与团结:迈向医疗保健双层体系的道路又向前迈进了一步。
J Med Philos. 2008 Jun;33(3):191-7. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn012.
3
Market reforms in Swedish health care: normative reorientation and welfare state sustainability.瑞典医疗保健领域的市场改革:规范重新定位与福利国家可持续性
J Med Philos. 2008 Jun;33(3):241-61. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn010.
4
The demand for policy analysis in health reform: the view from the Romanian partnership.卫生改革中的政策分析需求:罗马尼亚伙伴关系的视角
J Health Adm Educ. 1998 Spring;16(2):207-21.
5
United States health care.美国医疗保健。
Del Med J. 2003 Jun;75(6):229-30; discussion 231.
6
Stressing the safety net: effects of an economic downturn.强调安全网:经济衰退的影响
N C Med J. 2009 Jul-Aug;70(4):347-9.
7
The privatization of health care in Europe: an eight-country analysis.欧洲医疗保健的私有化:八国分析
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2006 Oct;31(5):981-1014. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-014.
8
Privatization processes in health care in Europe--a move in the right direction, a 'trendy' option, or a step back?欧洲医疗保健领域的私有化进程——是朝着正确方向迈进、一种“时髦”的选择,还是一种倒退?
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Oct;19(5):448-50. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp146.
9
From the 2008 presidential campaign: candidates' health care plans.源自2008年总统竞选:候选人的医疗保健计划。
J Med Assoc Ga. 2008;97(3):10-3.
10
Croatia: health system review.克罗地亚:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(3):xvii-xviii, 1-162.