Silverman Adam T, Goldfarb Michael A, Baker Thomas
Department of General Surgery, Monmouth Medical Center, 300 Second Avenue, Long Branch, NJ 07740, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2008 May-Jun;65(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.11.004.
Many interactions exist between surgical residents and attending surgeons, where residents debate whether they should "bother" to call an attending. Several instances have occurred when a senior resident or an attending has not been notified about a patient's status by a junior resident. Because of poor communication, care might be delayed, and surgeons and patients' relatives might not be informed of a change in status. Sometimes the resident's initial management was different than an attending's management. Communication issues were raised at our weekly Morbidity & Mortality conference. We decided to investigate the range of judgment as to when a resident should notify an attending surgeon.
The objective was to investigate the range of judgment as to when a surgical resident should notify an attending surgeon. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical circumstances when surgical residents should contact an attending surgeon directly or leave a message with the service. To investigate communication questions, we developed a survey of 34 clinical circumstances in which a surgical resident could call an attending. Sixteen residents and 16 attendings completed the survey entitled "Conditions where a surgical resident should consider contacting the surgical attending." From the information obtained from this study, a "must leave message" and "must speak to directly" list were created to guide residents as to when to call an attending.
A significant difference existed in the answers provided by residents and attendings. Residents and attendings agreed universally that an attending should be spoken to directly for 2 reasons: cardiopulmonary arrest and death. We created a "must speak to directly" list based on the attendings' answers. This list includes 10 clinical circumstances in which a surgical resident should speak directly with an attending regarding patient issues. Likewise, a "must leave message" list was created of an additional 8 reasons when a surgical resident must at least call the service of an attending and leave a message.
The purpose of our study was to help standardize communication between surgical residents and attendings regarding patient status. With these 2 standardized "must" lists, residents will have less uncertainty or hesitation to awaken an attending at night. This finding should improve the communication skills of surgical residents and ultimately improve the quality of patient care.
外科住院医师与主治外科医生之间存在许多互动情况,住院医师会纠结是否应该“麻烦”呼叫主治医生。曾发生过几次初级住院医师未将患者状况告知高级住院医师或主治医生的情况。由于沟通不畅,护理可能会延迟,外科医生和患者亲属可能未被告知患者状况的变化。有时住院医师最初的处理方式与主治医生的不同。在我们每周的发病率与死亡率会议上提出了沟通问题。我们决定调查住院医师应在何时通知主治外科医生的判断范围。
目的是调查外科住院医师应在何时通知主治外科医生的判断范围。本研究的目的是确定外科住院医师应直接联系主治外科医生或给科室留信息的临床情况。为调查沟通问题,我们设计了一项针对34种临床情况的调查,外科住院医师在这些情况下可以呼叫主治医生。16名住院医师和16名主治医生完成了题为“外科住院医师应考虑联系外科主治医生的情况”的调查。根据本研究获得的信息,创建了“必须留信息”和“必须直接通话”清单,以指导住院医师何时呼叫主治医生。
住院医师和主治医生给出的答案存在显著差异。住院医师和主治医生普遍一致认为,出于两个原因应直接与主治医生通话:心肺骤停和死亡。我们根据主治医生的答案创建了“必须直接通话”清单。该清单包括10种临床情况,在此情况下外科住院医师应就患者问题直接与主治医生交谈。同样,还创建了一份“必须留信息”清单,列出了另外8个原因,即外科住院医师必须至少呼叫主治医生的科室并留信息的情况。
我们研究的目的是帮助规范外科住院医师与主治医生之间关于患者状况的沟通。有了这两个标准化的“必须”清单,住院医师在夜间叫醒主治医生时将减少不确定性或犹豫。这一发现应能提高外科住院医师的沟通技巧,并最终提高患者护理质量。