Suppr超能文献

从中级护理到重症监护分诊:降低死亡率的质量改进项目。

Intermediate care to intensive care triage: A quality improvement project to reduce mortality.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Medical patients whose care needs exceed what is feasible on a general ward, but who do not clearly require critical care, may be admitted to an intermediate care unit (IMCU). Some IMCU patients deteriorate and require medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission. In 2012, staff in the Johns Hopkins IMCU expressed concern that patient acuity and the threshold for MICU admission were too high. Further, shared triage decision-making between residents and supervising physicians did not consistently occur.

METHODS

To improve our triage process, we used a 4Es quality improvement framework (engage, educate, execute, evaluate) to (1) educate residents and fellows regarding principles of triage and (2) facilitate real-time communication between MICU residents conducting triage and supervising physicians.

RESULTS

Among patients transferred from the IMCU to the MICU during baseline (n=83;July-December 2012) and intervention phases (n=94;July-December 2013), unadjusted mortality decreased from 34% to 21% (p=0.06). After adjusting for severity of illness, admitting diagnosis, and bed availability, the odds of death were lower during the intervention vs. baseline phase (OR 0.33; 95%CI 0.11-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a structured quality improvement process targeting triage education and increased resident/supervisor communication, we demonstrated reduced mortality among patients transferred from the IMCU to the MICU.

摘要

目的

对于那些护理需求超出普通病房能力范围但又不需要重症监护的医疗患者,可能会被收入中级护理单元(IMCU)。一些 IMCU 患者病情恶化,需要转入医疗重症监护病房(MICU)。2012 年,约翰霍普金斯大学 IMCU 的工作人员对患者的严重程度和转入 MICU 的门槛过高表示担忧。此外,住院医师和主治医生之间并没有进行共同的分诊决策。

方法

为了改善我们的分诊流程,我们使用了 4E 质量改进框架(参与、教育、执行、评估),(1)对住院医师和研究员进行分诊原则的教育,(2)促进 MICU 进行分诊的住院医师和主治医生之间的实时沟通。

结果

在基线期(n=83;2012 年 7 月至 12 月)和干预期(n=94;2013 年 7 月至 12 月)期间,从 IMCU 转入 MICU 的患者中,未调整的死亡率从 34%降至 21%(p=0.06)。在调整了疾病严重程度、入院诊断和床位可用性后,与基线期相比,干预期的死亡风险更低(OR 0.33;95%CI 0.11-0.98)。

结论

通过使用针对分诊教育和增加住院医师/主治医生沟通的结构化质量改进流程,我们证明了从 IMCU 转入 MICU 的患者的死亡率有所降低。

相似文献

9
Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission.重症监护病房入院分诊决策的评估
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jun;27(6):1073-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199906000-00021.

引用本文的文献

5

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验